204
submitted 2 years ago by girlfreddy@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world

Five people were able to escape a hot, acidic pond in Yellowstone National Park after the sport utility vehicle they were riding in went off the road and into an inactive geyser, park officials said Friday.

The passengers were able to get out of the 105 degree Fahrenheit (41 degrees Celsius) water on their own after the crash Thursday morning and were taken to the hospital for treatment of non-life-threatening injuries, park spokesperson Morgan Warthin said in a statement.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] foggy@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

There are minimal details available.

What makes you say distracted driver?

Heart attack, stroke, seizure, bee sting, wasp, spider bite, snakes, malfunction of the vehicle, vehicle unknowingly damaged, avoiding wildlife, avoiding other drivers, spilled hot coffee, incidental choking, heat exhaustion, dehydration, bald tires, poorly maintained road without proper signage, Maybe someone's cell phone battery blew up and it startled the driver.

There's 1000 reasons a car accident can happen. We don't need to assume the worst in people.

I'm all for a little shame if we find out they were hammered listening to bon Jovi with their heads out the window, yeah. But like, chill.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

No lie. And besides, the author would be a fool to even hint at the driver's culpability with no information. That's a lawsuit waiting to happen.

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Since they got out on their own and walked away from it, you can rule out the more serious medical possibilities

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Not really. Any of the other 4 could have rescued the 5th who may have been incapacitated.

This article provides basically 0 information.

There's no reason to make assumptions that belittle others without evidence.

[-] Malfeasant@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

All of those things are possible, but statistically, being distracted is far more likely than any of them... More likely than most of them combined, even.

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Source?

I cannot find anything that even remotely agrees with that stance.

this study is from 2007 - 2018. Doesn't even rank.

Forbes is saying about 8% of deaths, but not much else.

8% isn't a lot, it certainly isn't more than any others combined...

[-] vxx@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

Your whole list would result in varying degrees of distraction.

[-] ieatpillowtags@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The term “distracted driving” refers specifically to the driver not paying attention when they should have been, and not to them being “distracted” by some event that they have to respond to.

[-] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name -4 points 2 years ago

Hot take, all of those are the driver's fault. Aside from unexpected health conditions, but you don't see people just walking down the street and falling over every day. Heck, you get your license suspended if your doctor even thinks you have a risk of seizures.

If you can't control your car in any of those other conditions, and/or avoid those conditions, you should not be behind the wheel of a deadly vehicle.

Yes, we absolutely should have blamed the pilots for the Boeing crashes.

[-] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 2 points 2 years ago

There's a difference between being too lazy to replace your tires and a plane unexpectedly nose diving in an undocumented way.

this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2024
204 points (97.2% liked)

News

36221 readers
351 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS