468
submitted 4 months ago by simple@lemm.ee to c/games@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Wilzax@lemmy.world 97 points 4 months ago

Failure of larger companies to make a competitive alternative to steam is not anticompetitive behavior on the part of Valve

[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Yeah who TF are their lawyers? Anticompetitive behavior is just that—there have o be actions taken, at least in the United States. And Steam doesn't have exclusivity agreements so IDK what they're gonna argue.

[-] skaffi@infosec.pub 2 points 4 months ago

TF2 lawyers, it would seem.
Their legal Offense has evidently been workgrouped by Scout, Soldier and Pyro, judging by this particular legal argument. To think the Mercenaries would turn on their creator... Well, they're mercenaries!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2024
468 points (94.7% liked)

Games

32674 readers
428 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS