81
submitted 3 months ago by Blaze@lemmy.zip to c/linux@programming.dev
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

Lift and shift may be out of the question tho.

That and cost are the real issue. This is not their app, so they cannot rearchitect it. To make it fit to best use cloud resources, the thing would need to be rebuilt from scratch, and the savings are just not there to do so.

We need to move 8 gigabytes per second, sustained, which Azure can do at their highest tier. The problem is that, as I said, this is the smallest of our medium clients, and at the tier that can sustain that, the cost per terabyte per month is well beyond the client's budget. We told them to go with Exadata but the initial sticker shock and the execs lack of faith on their IT team made them run. Now they are committed to Azure. Just last week we had that call where we told Azure our requirements and they just came back with the price a few days ago. Suddenly, dropping seven figures for the hardware doesn't seem too expensive.

Whatever. We get paid either way.

this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
81 points (97.6% liked)

Linux

5218 readers
9 users here now

A community for everything relating to the linux operating system

Also check out !linux_memes@programming.dev

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS