373
submitted 2 years ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Many people choose to live in neighborhoods with an HOA and I don't see why they should be forbidden to do that. "I know what's good for you better than you do" ought to require a high burden of proof.

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago

I know what's good for you better than you do

Isn't that kind of the definition of what an HOA does?

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago

Technically an HOA is grassroots community derived governance to establish and maintain shared interests related to the neighborhood.

[-] bamboo@lemm.ee 11 points 2 years ago

Nowadays most of them are created by land developers, which often maintain complete control for many years after the first houses are sold in the community. Nothing grassroots about them when they are founded and run by a private company.

[-] andyburke@fedia.io 4 points 2 years ago

If this is what they actually were, I would be for them.

This is almost never what they actually are.

I am 100% positive there are some shrinking.number of good HOAs out there.

[-] Evotech@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

This, also You only hear about bad HOAs

[-] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Not necessarily. I know a guy who lives in a rural area and still somehow managed to find a house with an HOA, because he wanted access to shared amenities. Beyond that, HOA rules would ideally be like an agreement that I won't be a bad neighbor to you if you won't be a bad neighbor to me. It does seem like HOA boards attract petty people, but only the very worst will get in the news while the normal ones quietly do their thing.

(Also, it appears that the lemonade stand in the article wasn't actually violating the HOA rules.)

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 9 points 2 years ago

All fine and dandy until HOAs are all that's available and you're paying $100s per month to one of the handful of major developers in the country that built the neighborhood and coincidentally still controls the HOA. Ever been to Florida?

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago

Fuck no, who would willingly go there? Being born there, stuck there, I get it. But traveling/vacationing? My God

[-] nomous@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Worst drivers I've ever dealt with were in FL.

[-] henfredemars@infosec.pub 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I still have compassion for those who live a HOA and then go on to complain because choosing to live there is a complex decision involving many factors. In some parts of the country, there might be no options to practically avoid a HOA.

“I know what’s good for you” is precisely the ethos of the HOA. I’d have less compassion if housing wasn’t such a tight commodity. In that case, it’s a choice. But I think in the current market it doesn’t always feel like one.

I don’t think an outright ban is the right answer either.

this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2024
373 points (98.2% liked)

News

35735 readers
1166 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS