560
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 127 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Trump was going to push and threaten until this happened. It shouldn’t be a surprise after all this time and all his ranting and it should be granted. He’s accused of using his followers to stage an attack; of course he shouldn’t be allowed to again.

[-] DarkGamer@kbin.social 56 points 1 year ago

I suspect stochastic terrorism is the last card he has to play.

[-] ALostInquirer@lemm.ee 25 points 1 year ago

Wouldn't the real last card be organizing & mounting a full blown insurrection? Not like the first attempt where he could try to keep his hands relatively clean of it, as he's tried to do in a number of other criminal schemes related to his businesses.

[-] PolydoreSmith@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

Part of me wishes he would try it, because you just don’t come for the US Federal Government. Trump talks a big game and has a following, but the Feds are fucking psychos. These people killed MLK. These people have overthrown countless foreign governments. They’ve been trafficking drugs, weapons, and humans since before you and I were born.

I’m not saying I’m happy about it. I’m ashamed to be American every day that I wake up. But Trump is small potatoes to them. If he ever tried a coup for real it would end very badly for him, I promise you.

[-] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

The system is designed to protect and preserve the status quo. Apparently he forgot that, I doubt he is up to date on his American history.

[-] DragonAce@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I doubt he knows the first thing about American history. Hes has several old teachers admit he was a fucking moron and IIRC there is documentation that Trump Sr paid his son's way thru school. So that moron probably knows less about US history than most middle school kids.

[-] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

With the way the Republicans are speedrunning the destruction of the already fractured education system in this country I don't know if the middle schoolers are going to fare much better unfortunately.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 9 points 1 year ago

Well if they can walk and talk at the same time they're already doing better than Donny.

[-] UristMcHolland@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Considering the dude literally can't read, i'd wager you are correct.

[-] davepleasebehave@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

And what if the feds got on board?

[-] Elderos@lemmings.world 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I am convinced he wanted a full blown insurrection the first time around, and fully planned to enter the capitol as newly coronated emperor. He wanted armed protesters to hang around his rally, and he fully planned to go there. The reason he didn't is that once he got into his car the secret service over ruled his last-minute request (because he knew it would not be approved), and he got MAD. He tried to physically take control of the car, but yeah, apparently the president does not have the authority to put himself in harm's way.

[-] HewlettHackard@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago

Check out paragraph 81 of the indictment. One of his co-conspirators was having a discussion with a lawyer; the lawyer said staying in office past January 20 would trigger “riots in every major city in the United States, and the co-conspirator replied, “Well, [lawyer], that’s why there’s an Insurrection Act”.

[-] TechyDad@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Does it count as irony if Trump sees a crowd storming The Capitol in an attempt to kill legislators and the Vice President and says "these are patriots" but when he's informed that people will get upset if he breaks democracy and seizes power, he claims that they will be insurrectionists?

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 14 points 1 year ago

He and his merry band of idiot followers can't organise a coup, they don't have the collective brain power. IQ in the low 40s, no idea what's going on in the world outside of their bubble, and prone to infighting and arguing about whose conspiracy theory is the correct conspiracy theory.

They all think they would just march in waving their guns around, and automatically win, but what would actually happen is they'd end up getting cut to ribbons, then the rest would run away.

[-] tryptaminev@feddit.de 21 points 1 year ago

you dont need millions of smart people. you only need a few hundred smart ones to guide the army of idiots

[-] timewarp@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

If I could describe the Republican party in two sentences, this would be it. They know they are liars too, but they just don't care as long as their voters do.

[-] DarkGamer@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Wouldn’t the real last card be organizing & mounting a full blown insurrection? Not like the first attempt where he could try to keep his hands relatively clean of it, as he’s tried to do in a number of other criminal schemes related to his businesses.

I doubt he'd be capable of orchestrating that. he threw his insurrectionists under the bus last time by inciting them and then not pardoning them; Trumpers willing to do such a thing are in or going to prison. Makes it hard to incentivize the next batch.

He's lost support in the military. Can you imagine him trying to lead troops like a general? It would be the shortest coup ever. He'd probably change enemy troop locations with a sharpie because he doesn't like where they are.

Trump is good at spewing vile rhetoric, he's not competent or popular enough to carry out a successful violent insurrection.

[-] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

He only didn’t support them because it failed. Otherwise he would have gone all the way.

[-] BigNote@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Not to mention that the US military's senior officer corps absolutely despises him for a suite of reasons that should be obvious to anyone who's been half awake and has a brain.

[-] mayo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/read-full-the-indictment-against-trump-for-his-efforts-to-overturn-the-2020-election

Paragraph 83

Trump is briefed on an overseas national security issue, given some options to respond and his reply is "we'll leave that for the next guy" since it was too close to inauguration day.

I can't imagine Trump is popular with anyone outside of this stans.

[-] 520@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Perhaps it was intended to be. Maybe even Trump is surprised he's still alive and out if jail

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago

naw. he's going to keep doing it until they lock him up and take his phone away. I say we just skip the end and lock him up until the trial. And then forget where the key was placed.

[-] TechyDad@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

If he keeps threatening witnesses, the prosecutor, judges, etc and refuses to stop he just might end up in jail. He'll definitely be given more chances to stop than you or I would. (Then again, if you or I were facing these charges, we'd be awaiting trial in a jail cell.) The DC judge doesn't seem like the type to allow shenanigans though. Eventually he'll exhaust her patience and he'll get a "next violation will send you to jail for contempt of court." Trump will inevitably violate this and she might send him to jail.

Of course, the right will yell and scream about how this is "Joe Biden imprisoning his political opponents," ignoring that Trump would have been given multiple warnings to stop his behavior and didn't listen. What happens to Trump shouldn't take "what will the right say" into consideration, though, apart from 1) shoring everything up against any good faith arguments and 2) increasing security against any crazies looking to hit at "those evil liberals that are persecuting God King Trump."

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

If we were facing these things, the trial would have been over within the first three months.

It’s been over two years. This entire thing is a joke

[-] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

I would put money on Trump violating the terms of this protective order. The question is will the court do what is necessary to prevent him from tainting a jury or tampering with witnesses which he has already warned about during his arraignment?

I want to believe that they will take these threats seriously given his track record of escalating violence when he has been backed into a corner. I just don't think it should require someone else getting injured or killed before they act. Multiple people have already lost their lives over this, and how many more is it going to take before he will be held accountable for that too?

this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2023
560 points (97.9% liked)

politics

19144 readers
1358 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS