view the rest of the comments
Unpopular Opinion
Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!
How voting works:
Vote the opposite of the norm.
If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.
Guidelines:
Tag your post, if possible (not required)
- If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
- If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].
Rules:
1. NO POLITICS
Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.
2. Be civil.
Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...
Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.
5. No trolling.
This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.
Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/
I mean, if we're just talking high bitrate digital audio then yeah, convenience and sound wise digital beats the pants off of analog any day. CDs in particular though? Nah. Gimme that solid state no moving parts convenience I get from packing 50GB of flac, aac or vorbis rips onto my phone and a Chromecast audio to plug into my sound system.
Thousand dollars says if I put a 256kbps mp3 left channel and any bitrate/sample rate FLAC in right channel on your speakers or headphones (same song obviously) you’d never know it.
Why would i not preserve all the audio though?
Preservation is a different beast and not something most people concern themselves with. If you keep your music on your computer/mobile then that space becomes a bigger issue unless you keep externals or don’t have that much music.
Storage capacity will keep getting cheaper and more reliable; a lot is invested on that horse. Preserving the audio will always be the best bet for the future!
Without a doubt. As I said in another comment, anytime I get a new record in the mail I immediately clean it thoroughly and then digitize the contents. I then cut it into “sides“ and exported as wav, FLAC, and 128kbps mp3.
It’s like my own little hobbyist archival project. It’s very fun and i get to take my records “on the road“ with me! I host them on my Plex server
With displays getting cheaper and bendable, batteries and energy being more efficient, etc... For the vinyl lovers on this thread, imagine having the art displayed on color accurate screens dedicated for it (can show lyrics, and other "extras" you like as well). Having access to it globally with the best quality possible without transporting basically anything. The future is 1000% this and it is awesome!
You get it
This is from the same crew that says eyes can't see more than 30fps
Nope doesn’t even remotely compare. We are talking about diminishing returns. The jump from 30fps to a higher one would be like going from 96kbps to a higher sample rate. The improvement is obvious to virtually everyone.
A better example would be telling people to discern between any 2 framerates above 144fps.