549
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

His intervention comes as the presidents of Brazil, Mexico and Colombia all called on Venezuela to release the full details of last Sunday's election.

It has also attracted global criticism, with many governments around the world demanding the Venezuelan government release proof of the result.

The result has been recognised by Venezuelan allies China, Russia and Iran.

But, the US, European Union and other G7 countries have called on Mr Maduro’s government to release detailed voting data.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] generichate1546@lemmynsfw.com 30 points 3 months ago

I'm going to wait until I see primary evidence, the US doesn't have the most honest track records with South American countries

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

Not just that, but it's also that Anthony Blinken wrote Israeli propaganda articles since 80s.

If you like conspiracy theories, he may have been familiar to J Epstein, who may have had ties with Mossad (then that whole pedophile operation makes perfect sense as a very efficient way to blackmail a lot of powerful people, and him offing himself makes more sense).

If you don't, the fact stands that Anthony Blinken has acted in the interests of a foreign fascist state since 80s.

This may be a bit philosophical, but South America in general has much more progressive approach to international law than the rest of the world, the Montevideo convention as the most notable example, but also the first country to recognize the Armenian Genocide was Uruguay, and despite all the dictatorships, crime and trafficking I'd say in some sense it's still the least fascist part of the world.

In any case, who in their right mind really believes Maduro won? But I'm sure even Venezuelan opposition doesn't want US to protect them Desert Storm style.

[-] stepan@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago
[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

What are you talking about the US has never done anything bad in south America, unless you count Brazil, Argentina, Bolivia, ans Chile. Yeah the list is surprisingly short in south America.

[-] kerrigan778@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Uh... Colombia??? Kind of a biggie to leave out!

*Edit, I'm sorry, I live next to the river, I'm used to spelling the name Columbia because we insisted on spelling his name wrong in the US whereas they kept the Italian spelling in South America, he was still a genocidal asshole who could not have discovered a place that already had inhabitants but also was not even the first European to go there though, maybe we shouldn't name anything after him though technically the river is named after a ship which was named after the person.

[-] apolo399@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago
[-] kerrigan778@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Lol I'm sorry, I blame autocorrect but maybe just me being a dummy. I talk about the brand (and river) a lot more often than the country in my daily life.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

I was using a list of coups. So I kinda forgot about the fuckery in Columbia.

this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2024
549 points (95.5% liked)

World News

39104 readers
1240 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS