538
submitted 3 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 71 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

"And you know what I'm very upset of?" Pierce added. "Let's look at the little Black girl who dreams of being president of the United States in a few years."

"Kamala Harris is taking that title away just so she can sit here and try to win a voting bloc."

This is a weird fucking argument. Is he under the impression that if we elect a Black Woman that we won't be allowed to do it again? That once we elect Kamala we're obligated to return to an endless line of white men presidents?

Or is he misspeaking here and saying that Kamala is stealing the title of "First Black Woman President" from some hypothetical little girl that deserves the "title" of First Black Woman President in like 20-30 years when she's old enough to run for president (more like 50-60 years given the age of actual elected presidents)? Apparently we should keep voting against Black Women for the next few decades / half a century to save that covered title for some future Black Woman politician...

All because they think that Jamaicans aren't Black, because Black people can only come directly from Africa?

They managed to cram a "save the children" argument, a dishonest idpol narrative, and overt racism into one argument. I'm as impressed with their efficiency as I am disgusted with their lack of humanity.

[-] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago

Man it's not just Trump. It seems all these right wing nuts really can't grasp the concept of biracial identities. It just wooshes right past their head and they keep making this "fake black" argument cause she's not 100% African blood. Which by the way was the thing they were demonizing Obama for having too much of, and demanded his birth certificate.

They think if you're born biracial you have to pick one race and stick with it lol

[-] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 14 points 3 months ago

I mean, obsession with racial purity is definitely not something the far-right is new to, I guess I shouldn't be surprised that this is how they think normal people discuss race...

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 months ago

It seems all these right wing nuts really can't grasp the concept of biracial identities

They understand, they just think this is a "dog whistle" instead of overt racism.

[-] linearchaos@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

No no, they completely grasp it. They just make the answer whatever they want it to be at the time.

[-] aStonedSanta@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago

“I’m just trolling bro.” 😎

/s

[-] AShadyRaven@lemmy.zip 12 points 3 months ago

the words of someone DESPERATE to find a way to call libs racist

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

Nope, just the one. Just the token black person so everyone knows we're inclusive. We're not allowed any others, ever again.

[-] 800XL@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Is there really a group of white people gatekeeping blackness?

Is there really a group of white racial-purity supremecists stroking out and shitting themselves over black racial-purity and not being black enough?

Who is their baseline for blackness?

What the hell is even going on?

this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
538 points (96.7% liked)

News

23406 readers
1625 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS