119
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2023
119 points (99.2% liked)
Technology
58150 readers
4154 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Indeed. They were planning to rip out and replace the pad anyway, and believed that they'd at least get one launch out of the existing one, so they saw no reason to delay. If they'd waited for the new pad to be installed they would only just be gearing up for their first test flight right now. They've had four months to refine the rocket's design based on the data they got from the first test launch.
They misjudged the robustness of the original launch pad, but only somewhat. IMO the much more serious misjudgement was their flight termination system, they blew holes in the ship's tanks when it started tumbling out of control and it took something like 40 seconds for the ship to finally disintegrate after that. That was a situation where they underestimated the robustness of their systems. The new flight termination system is much more powerful.