66
submitted 3 months ago by Blaze@sopuli.xyz to c/television@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SquiffSquiff@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago
[-] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 months ago

I'm aware. And what I'm saying is that reboots aren't necessary. It's nice when they work out like with BSG, but for every reboot success story there are dozens of shitty failed reboots or adaptations of existing stories.

[-] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

but that has nothing to do with being a reboot or not. if they made those original stories instead they'd fail just the same, probably even harder.

[-] GraniteM@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

The difference is that the original BSG was, if we're being honest, a bit crap. The '03 reboot took the skeleton of a good idea (humans on the run from an implacable army of robots) and lifted it up to some of the best scifi ever made. A reboot is warranted if the original leaves space for improvement, and the more such space the better. The '03 BSG is so good that virtually no such space exists. Ditto for conversations about rebooting the Lord of the Rings; what are you going to improve on?

[-] SquiffSquiff@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Lord of the rings has aged noticeably and not in a good way. I really loved BSG2003 but I haven't rewatched more than a few episodes. A lot of commenters here are suggesting that it's aged poorly in places and the ending was always disappointing.

this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2024
66 points (94.6% liked)

Television

4621 readers
20 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS