475
submitted 3 months ago by Xatolos@reddthat.com to c/news@lemmy.world

The lawsuit claims that Dr. Kanokporn Tangsuan suffered a fatal allergic reaction after eating at a Disney Springs restaurant despite repeatedly informing the waiter of her severe allergy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] gibmiser@lemmy.world 405 points 3 months ago

"Disney is calling for the lawsuit to be dismissed because her husband signed up for a one-month trial of the Disney+ streaming service years prior.

The company says signing up for the trial requires users to arbitrate all disputes with the company."

Some lawyers truly are scum.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 153 points 3 months ago

This could be a precedent-setting case. These fuckers better not get away with this.

[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 33 points 3 months ago

So would this mean that Disney can no longer use their massive legal department to crush fair use of their IP? If someone signs up for Disney+, the arbitration agreement goes both ways.

I would think a competent judge would just ask the Disney lawyer that question. Like, "do you want to be out of a job?"

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 59 points 3 months ago

No.

You and Disney agree to arbitrate all your claims. Disney still retains the right to fuck you over to the full extent of the legal system.

After all, corporations are people, and some people are more people than other people.

[-] Silentiea@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 3 months ago

That's the best paraphrase of Animal Farm I've heard in a while.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 3 months ago

That's actually a pretty sharp observation. Weaponize it against them in return.

[-] BossDj@lemm.ee 10 points 3 months ago

But this is happening in post-precedent America

[-] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 72 points 3 months ago

Maybe we can finally claw these arbitration powers back?

[-] iamericandre@lemmy.world 66 points 3 months ago
[-] QuantumSparkles@sh.itjust.works 80 points 3 months ago

Very much nottheonion material. Something like

”Disney Legal Team Argues that Agreeing to the Terms & Conditions of Their Streaming Platform Releases The Company of Any and All Potential Liability in Shellfish Poisonings”

[-] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

"Signing up for a free trial of Disney+ means they can kill you, legally."

[-] QuantumSparkles@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 months ago

”Disney Legal Team Argues that Agreeing to the Terms & Conditions of Their Streaming Platform Releases The Company of Any and All Potential Liability in Political Assassination”

[-] iamericandre@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago
[-] mke@lemmy.world 50 points 3 months ago

If a lawyer is scum, then so is the one paying them.

[-] BossDj@lemm.ee 8 points 3 months ago

"I don't care how you handle it, just handle it."

[-] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 42 points 3 months ago

Some people/companies/etc. really take “you miss 100% of the shots you don’t take” too far.

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 32 points 3 months ago

I do hope whoever suggested that this is a legitimate cause to dismiss the case dies of an intestinal blockage caused by hemorrhoids. Just a thing I hope.

[-] scytale@lemm.ee 28 points 3 months ago

Arguing over health/death via a technicality is one of the lowest of lows.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago

This shouldn't even be a technicality here. If this goes through and a TOS is universally binding to your life then the court system just died. Also they can put other ridiculous things in there like you owe them the subscription money in perpetuity even if you decide to uninstall the app. They'll argue the consideration is there because you can re-install at any time.

[-] Glemek@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Just get your bullets inscribed with "by receiving this bullet you have agreed to our tos, by which all liability is to be decided by the shooter's dog, who does not like you." Then murder is legal.

[-] Voltage@sh.itjust.works 26 points 3 months ago

this is actual parody dystopian movie level crazy wtf

[-] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 months ago

All corporate lawyers are scum.

[-] nifty@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Don’t blame lawyers, blame the lawmakers. Heck, people and/or civil society is responsible for petitioning to lawmakers for stronger protections. Absurd amounts of money/lobbying has perverted the process, which is why a lot of these entities need to be taxed of out their power to have lobbying money.

this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2024
475 points (99.4% liked)

News

23376 readers
1780 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS