475
submitted 2 years ago by Xatolos@reddthat.com to c/news@lemmy.world

The lawsuit claims that Dr. Kanokporn Tangsuan suffered a fatal allergic reaction after eating at a Disney Springs restaurant despite repeatedly informing the waiter of her severe allergy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] gibmiser@lemmy.world 405 points 2 years ago

"Disney is calling for the lawsuit to be dismissed because her husband signed up for a one-month trial of the Disney+ streaming service years prior.

The company says signing up for the trial requires users to arbitrate all disputes with the company."

Some lawyers truly are scum.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 153 points 2 years ago

This could be a precedent-setting case. These fuckers better not get away with this.

[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 33 points 2 years ago

So would this mean that Disney can no longer use their massive legal department to crush fair use of their IP? If someone signs up for Disney+, the arbitration agreement goes both ways.

I would think a competent judge would just ask the Disney lawyer that question. Like, "do you want to be out of a job?"

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 59 points 2 years ago

No.

You and Disney agree to arbitrate all your claims. Disney still retains the right to fuck you over to the full extent of the legal system.

After all, corporations are people, and some people are more people than other people.

[-] Silentiea@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 2 years ago

That's the best paraphrase of Animal Farm I've heard in a while.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 2 years ago

That's actually a pretty sharp observation. Weaponize it against them in return.

[-] BossDj@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago

But this is happening in post-precedent America

[-] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 72 points 2 years ago

Maybe we can finally claw these arbitration powers back?

[-] iamericandre@lemmy.world 66 points 2 years ago
[-] QuantumSparkles@sh.itjust.works 80 points 2 years ago

Very much nottheonion material. Something like

”Disney Legal Team Argues that Agreeing to the Terms & Conditions of Their Streaming Platform Releases The Company of Any and All Potential Liability in Shellfish Poisonings”

[-] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

"Signing up for a free trial of Disney+ means they can kill you, legally."

[-] QuantumSparkles@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 years ago

”Disney Legal Team Argues that Agreeing to the Terms & Conditions of Their Streaming Platform Releases The Company of Any and All Potential Liability in Political Assassination”

[-] iamericandre@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago
[-] mke@lemmy.world 50 points 2 years ago

If a lawyer is scum, then so is the one paying them.

[-] BossDj@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago

"I don't care how you handle it, just handle it."

[-] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 42 points 2 years ago

Some people/companies/etc. really take “you miss 100% of the shots you don’t take” too far.

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 32 points 2 years ago

I do hope whoever suggested that this is a legitimate cause to dismiss the case dies of an intestinal blockage caused by hemorrhoids. Just a thing I hope.

[-] Voltage@sh.itjust.works 26 points 2 years ago

this is actual parody dystopian movie level crazy wtf

[-] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 years ago

All corporate lawyers are scum.

[-] nifty@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

Don’t blame lawyers, blame the lawmakers. Heck, people and/or civil society is responsible for petitioning to lawmakers for stronger protections. Absurd amounts of money/lobbying has perverted the process, which is why a lot of these entities need to be taxed of out their power to have lobbying money.

this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2024
475 points (99.4% liked)

News

36366 readers
1069 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS