1128
submitted 2 years ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
  • Google is transitioning Chrome's extension support from the Manifest V2 framework to the V3.
  • This means users won't be able to use uBlock Origin to block ads on Google Chrome.
  • However, there's a new iteration of the app — uBlock Origin Lite, which is Manifest V3 compliant but doesn't boast the original version's comprehensive ad-blocking features.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ngwoo@lemmy.world 70 points 2 years ago

Use Firefox. If something you use ABSOLUTELY needs Chromium yell at whoever makes the thing. If that still doesn't work use Brave. But then go back to Firefox for everything else.

[-] Huckledebuck@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 years ago

I've switched to Brave. I only use it for general internet use. What am i missing out on if i don't go back to Firefox?

[-] Voltage@sh.itjust.works 30 points 2 years ago

I know its everyone's personal choice and all that but in my opinion people should stop using chromium engine browsers. It was a good engine however the fact that chromium has the majority users is the only thing holding lazy developers from porting websites to work with other browser engines gives google more control.

[-] Huckledebuck@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago

So what are the better options. I don't know much (anything) about web engines. Privacy is my top priority.

[-] stetech@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Most “browsers” being marketed out there are based off of Google’s Chromium project. They are effectively re-skins of it (simplifying a little). Examples include Brave, Vivaldi, Opera I believe.

Firefox is completely separate and independent from this ecosystem (which is also why there’s a separate extension store for Firefox).

The third and last major (>a couple % market share) engine is WebKit, which is the basis of Apple’s Safari.

There’s tons of cool stuff out there, but it’s either niche (platform/use case), unstable to use, and/or both. Examples: Servo, Ladybird, Orion

To sum it up, if you’re a normal, average user:

  • If you have exclusively Apple devices, probably try Safari (for the synchronization & battery efficiency)
  • If not, Firefox!
  • If you need it because of some really messed up development/compatibility issues, the last resort is ungoogled/de-googled Chromium

While on the topic, here’s some cool browser extensions:

Edit: fixed a link

[-] Huckledebuck@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago

Wow, thanks! I had no idea there was Bitwarden extension.

[-] Tja@programming.dev 7 points 2 years ago

What you are missing out on? Probably not much. Some sites might even work worse if you switch, due to lazyness or sabotage by devs.

Using Firefox is good for the ecosystem in general, to have a counter balance to Google. I use both Firefox and chromium and see very little difference. Some extensions might be worth it (like the title says), so that might be a difference for you.

[-] pyre@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago
[-] Huckledebuck@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Cool, I'll give it a shot.

Edit: is there a mobile version?

[-] hswolf@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

short answer: No

long answer: Most people just like to shout-out what they like, and don't want to know your use case. If you need pc/mobile sync, Firefox will be your best choice here.

[-] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 years ago

Support for Chromuin backed browsers ?

I keep Throriim there for the odd shit ball site thear refuses but then thats the point.

[-] Rob@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

What’s the general consensus on Arch? I really like the UX, although I stuck to Firefox on mobile.

[-] linearchaos@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago

Screw that. Use Firefox, but if you need Chrome, use brave, use Vivaldi, use Opera for all it mattwrs. Asanything that still works is fine.

This brave paranoia is just insane. You don't want crypto, don't use it. You don't trust brave use Vivaldi, but spreading fake fear is BS.

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 11 points 2 years ago

Brave altered URLs clicked to add their own affiliate links. Browsers should go to where you click. That's like their whole job. There are reasons to dislike Brave apart from crypto.

[-] linearchaos@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

4 years ago

Also Firefox sends all of your browser data to Google for safe browsing checks Right now.

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago

Are you talking about this? They say it only calls out to get updated lists and when you actually arrive at a phishing page to check if the page is still marked as suspicious.

Source: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/how-does-phishing-and-malware-protection-work#w_what-information-is-sent-to-mozilla-or-its-partners-when-phishing-and-malware-protection-is-enabled

Also, I agree it was 4 years ago. That's a fair point. To me it's super important and they've probably permanently lost my trust (or at least it's always going to be besmudged). If you believe they've changed in that time period (or it's not as critical to you) then that's fine.

For what it's worth, when I need a Chromium based browser because the site has a bug and won't work with Firefox my (current) go to is Brave. I use it on a semi regular basis because dndbeyond.com works poorly with Firefox. So every 2 to 4 weeks I use it for that.

[-] linearchaos@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

You can also disable FF from connecting to safe browsing with flags. I prefer to let my DNS handle that list.

My Work ADP portal also misbehaves in FF.

I've also made FF stop using Google search for anything.

I advocate people use whatever works for them. I'd advocate for Edge, but they have already clarified they intend to follow Chrome to the letter.

Vivaldi has claimed they intend to fork and not enforce V3, but acknowledge it's no small feat and they may fail.

Operam I believe has claimed they intend not to enforce V3

Brave goes as far as saying that they're immune to it even if they turned it on.

I don't trust any browser 100% Firefox was close and is still my most trusted.

I'm down with pushing everyone into Firefox, but I'm not loving the chrome variant hate. Use whatever works unless the browsers are currently acting bad.

[-] CafecitoHippo@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

You don’t want crypto, don’t use it.

I use Brave as my Chrome based browser when not using Floorp but there were other issues with Brave in the past like injecting their affiliate links unbeknownst to users so they could make money off them. They have reverted that decision but that they thought it was acceptable in the first place leaves some to question, rightly, what other shenanigans they might pull. They've also had issues with paying out Creators BAT tokens.

[-] linearchaos@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Yep company's not totally trustworthy neither is Google neither is Microsoft. By the way, Firefox still sends all of your websites to Google to get safe traffic prompts.

Brave also got and slapped by the SEC for the handling of their crypto sales.

The link issue you're speaking of was 4 years ago. The CEO issued a formal apology.

They're a funded company they are trying to make money to pay the developers to stay solvent.

On the upside they're using that money to fight Google's ad blocking and to keep manifest V3 optional.

The way they block the ads happens outside of manifest so even if they take the manifest code they still won't have ads. Of the chromium ancestry browsers they are the most likely to continue running long-term. They're also the fastest solution for YouTube blocking when YouTube makes changes.

I main Firefox but still use brave over edge or opera.

Right now, we need all the boats we have. Not everything works in Firefox you need to have a backup,

this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2024
1128 points (98.8% liked)

News

36429 readers
723 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS