1111
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago
[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

Democrats don't want to push the envelope though so it won't happen.

[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago

If we get supermajorities in the House and Senate it might. Otherwise, you're probably right. When we have 50 dem senators and one of them is Joe Manchin, well...

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

Good news is we don't have to worry about Manchin anymore. Bad news is that's pretty much a GOP seat now.

[-] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 2 months ago

Yeah, all the people bitching about Manchin never seem to get that the choice was always Manchin or a far right Republican, not Manchin or a west coast progressive.

You lost the ability to get anyone left of Manchin out of WV in 2000.

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Guys, no, we just need to run a far left lefty candidate in WV. This R+40 state is absolutely clamoring to vote for socialism because reasons. The Dems won't do it, though (both sides bad). Also it has to be a Dem and not a grassroots movement because this R+40 state clamoring to vote for a real socialist needs a socialist with DNC backing before they'll stop voting for racism.

[-] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 2 months ago

Interestingly enough, WV used to be a safe blue state for most of the state's history. Literally Gore ruined that.

Because they weren't blue due to progressive social policy, they were blue because of the unions. Gore went after the biggest union industries in the state, and no Dem since has thought how to fix it.

Of all people, Bernie did really well in the 2016 primary, but since Clinton got ~35% compared to Bernie's ~53% she of course got a majority of our state's delegates (by one).

If you wanted to get a Dem to poll well here, you'd have to drop the gun stuff almost entirely (a lot of rural folks and a lot of hunters, a lot of woods full of wild animals [and those woods are directly adjacent to most populated areas - the entire state is forested mountains], etc), not lead with the progressive social justice stuff (not denounce it, not ignore it, just not treat it as the top priority and focus of your message - it's there but it's not what you're selling yourself on), and then double down on working class concerns (this should be what you lead with and emphasize). Think something adjacent to social populism.

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

That's really interesting, I was not aware. Do you have anything more I could read on this? Wikipedia suggests that the change might be due to Gore's focus on climate when so many people there make a living from coal, that sounds plausible as well.

[-] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 months ago

Literally same thing. The largest exports for WV are coal, timber and natural gas.

WV had been consistently blue for most of state history, and the reasons for that were very much tied up in the labor movement, especially as regards unionizing coal mines. Support for Democrats in WV extended outward from the unions, especially the mine unions. And WV put up with some positions it broadly wasn't fond of from Dems because of the unions (like the gun stuff).

Gore's "focus on climate" was the start of the Dems being actively hostile to coal, and to a lesser extent natural gas and timber. It's hard to keep most of your support coming from the union when you're attacking the industry the union represents.

Hillary Clinton at least came up with an alternative plan but it both wasn't very good and was sold in about the worst way possible. "I'm going to put a bunch of coal companies and coal miners out of business" was the single most heard Hillary Clinton quote in WV leading up to the election - it was at the heart of every ad for every GOP politician from Trump all the way down ballot. She did worse in the general here than she did in the primary, and she only got 35% in the primary, narrowly winning the state over Bernie Sanders at 53%.

[-] 4lan@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

hilarious a state filled with fentanyl addicted welfare-queens is against socialism lol

I live near the border. that place is a dystopian redneck hellhole

[-] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 months ago

Dare I ask which border? Like are we talking South Point OH, Marietta OH, somewhere like Ashland KY or on the VA or MA borders?

[-] 4lan@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

How dumb do you think I am

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Yeah well if it's anything like the Democrats were in Arizona until recently the state party is basically defunct. You'll have professional politicians running against single issue school teachers. The DNC is not good with reaching out to help state parties. A large part of the reason the GOP hasn't died from going far right is the Democrats seem happy to let them have rural states without any fight. Which of course means the people there only get one political point of view too.

[-] 4lan@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

We have elected officials literally making up lies about teachers here to get them fired. Our sheriff got away with it because he is immune. They used our tax dollars to pay her off he wouldn't have to get embarrassed in court before re-election

He is a hardcore Trumper

[-] 4lan@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

~~Democrats ~~ Liberals don't want to push the envelope

Spineless liberals are losing ground in the party. Status quo and subservience to banks is no longer popular in our party. Progressives are slowly overcoming liberals.

Liberals want to throw money at problems, ignoring root causes Progressives want to tackle the root causes

this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2024
1111 points (98.6% liked)

politics

19072 readers
1918 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS