296
Behold, Diablo is fully playable in your browser
(arstechnica.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2024
296 points (99.0% liked)
Technology
59414 readers
1389 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I'm going to be a stick in this mud. And I suspect I might get downvoted for my D3 opinions.... but hear me out.
D3 was BETTER at launch than it is now. Yes it needed work... but I think D3 was better in its original state than it is now (though both were "shit" comparatively to D2). They changed too much shit too quickly. The game became dumb after most of those changes.
D4 I played the beta, hoping that it would be a return to older blizzard mentalities... and it just wasn't it for me at all. My cousin wanted me to play again more recently... I played a few hours under his shit to check it out again (about 100 hours because I know that end game matters)... I still don't see any of that original captured lightning. It's still super uninspired and boring.
D1 was amazing... D2 literally captured magic. It's been downhill since from my point of view. Especially with Blizzard becoming actiblizzion and become complete and utter crap in of themselves.
I won’t downvote you for having an opinion on a game that doesn’t align with mine. Diverse thought is what makes conversation interesting!
I suspect part of the issue is that what D3 and D4 are is significantly different from what D2 was. Story-wise I think they’re all about the same level of “good but not amazing,” but in terms of gameplay they differ a lot. Largely because D3 and D4 came so much later in the evolution of the ARPG genre.
D2 is much slower paced, more difficult, requires much more careful play. D3 and D4, in my experience, are mostly about moving fast and getting the most and biggest numbers on the screen. Not that there isn’t difficulty available in D3 and D4, but that difficulty is very different.
D3 and D4 almost feel like a different genre, so if you go into them expecting more of the same feel as D2, it can be disappointing.
Of course my position on this could be because I’ve had much more experience with 3 and 4 than I’ve had with 2.