1243
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 5 points 10 months ago

By your logic, any moving animal is conscious and aware?

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk -2 points 10 months ago

Yes? Animals are conscious and aware of their surroundings

[-] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 3 points 10 months ago

You remember being in the womb then? Or being a sperm? Those move, you know.

Bacteria move, but I don't think you can argue they have minds capable of suffering. Your body would be doing a lot of murder every second of every day in that case. What about insects? Do you consider ants and mosquitos conscious? Should they be protected by animal rights laws?

For a lot of the duration of a pregnancy, a fetus is not composed of enough cells to be much different.

The body autonomy, let alone the health of a woman should not be compromised to "protect" a life that isn't a life yet.

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk -3 points 10 months ago

I don't remember being 1 or 2 years old. You saying it's okay to murder me as long as I don't remember it when I'm older or something? 🤣

The difference between a foetus and bacteria or ants, is that a foetus is human. Bacteria and ants aren't. I cannot believe we've stooped to this level of immorality.

[-] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

You saying it's okay to murder me as long as I don't remember it when I'm older or something?

One could make that point, but no.

Infanticide being a crime does not compromise the body autonomy or health of another conscious human. Criminalizing abortion, does.

The difference between a foetus and bacteria or ants, is that a foetus is human. Bacteria and ants aren't.

This is a false distinction. Why is human life more important than other life? What elevates a small collection of human cells above an equivalent number of insect cells?

I cannot believe we've stooped to this level of immorality.

I could say the same. This sentence serves no purpose, and will convince absolutely no-one that your sense of ethics is more developed than mine.

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk -1 points 10 months ago

Abortion isn't "bodily autonomy" Your body doesn't automatically have a miscarriage on a whim. It's inserting an instrument into a woman's body and destroying another person who's in there. Human life is more valuable than human life. We literally eat animals. Again, the fact I have to explain to someone that killing another person because you don't want to face up to the consequences of your actions, and no, killing a person isn't the same as killing an animal, shows how far we've regressed.

[-] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

You have no idea what you're talking about.

A collection of sells that may or may not even have formed neurons yet, is not a person

consequences of your actions

And there it is. You want women to be punished for the crime of having sex. Or being raped. Or having a condom break. Whatever.

You're a misogynist asshole with no argument.

Human life is more valuable than human life.

I think you meant to claim that undeveloped fetuses have more rights than women.

[-] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Also, look up what body autonomy means. It doesn't mean what you seem to think it means.

this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2024
1243 points (97.7% liked)

Comic Strips

17471 readers
1617 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS