814

Lemmy devs are considering making all votes public - have your say (github.com)

submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by rimu@piefed.social to c/fediverse@lemmy.world

859 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Probably better to post in the github issue rather than replying here.

https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/4967

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] kux@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

piefed is already extremely redditty maintaining behind-the-scenes 'karma' and 'attitude' for users whether they signed up for it or not. why shouldn't this info be public instead of in the hands of admins only?

https://join.piefed.social/2024/06/22/piefed-features-for-growing-healthy-communities/

[-] can@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Oof, I'd rather just stick to Lemmy and let people see my votes rather than deal with karma.

[-] kux@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

that's kind of the point, other instances are already aggregating and rating your votes given and received, why shouldn't lemmy show this to you?

[-] can@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

I liked it being relatively obfuscated. Even though I rarely downvote. But the ones I do are the ones I'd like to avoid. Tbh I'm more ambivalent compared to my thoughts on karma.

[-] sramder@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

People who downvote more than upvote tend to be the ones who get in fights a lot and say snarky, inflammatory and negative things.

Summed up my whole sense of humor in half a throwaway sentence ;-)

Seriously though, interesting read, thank you kux… you can really feel the author’s frustration and yet I can’t help but feel that they are interested in a certain kind of idealistic online community. Reddit but with a really restrictive HOA where everyone has the exact same color mailbox.

[-] kux@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

the author almost certainly has more experience in managing online communities than me (i have none) but it seems counterintuitive to see a dumb take, downvote and bother to leave an argumentative reply rather than just downvote and scroll past. downvotes in this case would defuse potential arguments rather than start them, but i'll defer to the author and assume that's not what happens

[-] sramder@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

That was my take on it too. The vague sense that you’re just going to end up with nothing but circle-jerks if you implement all these suggestions. I could also just be whooshing an attempt a levity, something obvious to a seasoned community moderator.

Hopefully my shitty attempts at socratic method rate a bit better then trolling, but I often doubt it :-)