890
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2024
890 points (97.0% liked)
People Twitter
7709 readers
1565 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Almost as if the threat of criminal prosecution is all we need for those who break the social contract for their own personal gain and self aggrandizement to rescind their shitty views and cower in a corner pissing themselves.
Take your TERF bullshit and shove it all the way up inside your butthole.
She isn't facing a criminal prosecution.
Unfortunately.
I am sure your ardent support for thought policing will never backfire!
Her thoughts, such as they are, are not at issue here.
You can't control my thoughts! Even medicines can't control MY thoughts!
The thought in question is that a specific group of people should stop existing. I'm sure that won't backfire either.
In a healthy society people can have different opinions.
I never said people should "agree to disagree", and people should debate opinions they think are bad. A good debate can show strengths and weaknesses of arguments.
People have tried this for ages. It has not worked. These bigots are not debating in good faith. The only response is the verbal or legal equivalent of bapping them on the nose with a newspaper and going, "NO! BAD!"
Debate does not work if they are not arguing in good faith
Why aren't people more tolerant of Nazi beliefs?
When your differing opinion threatens a whole group of people it has no place in a healthy society.
In a healthy society people have the critical thinking skills you lack.