237
submitted 1 month ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

The largest diamond found in more than a century has been unearthed at a mine in Botswana, and the country’s president showed off the fist-sized stone to the world at a viewing ceremony Thursday.

The Botswana government says the huge 2,492-carat diamond is the second-biggest ever discovered in a mine. It’s the biggest diamond found since 1905.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 month ago

I kind of think they should leave it like that.

[-] CaliforniaSober@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

They likely will! If touched it is then “cut” and less value. The raw “uncut” version is what will sell.

They said the 1905 one was cut into multiple gems?! Seems such a waste.

[-] CaliforniaSober@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

Eventually it’s how things go… basically dividing the wealth but ultimately we’re talking about bullshit carbon and shouldn’t be so concerned. Yet…

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 month ago

I mean, just as a scientific object it's fascinating. I'm not going to be shamed about caring just because other people care for stupid reasons, haha.

[-] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Just given the nature of diamonds and light, there are more interesting shapes. They could cut it into a simple cubic, but that wouldn't be very interesting and you would still have some substantial pieces left over to make other diamonds from. So the usual plan is to cut more or less the largest stone you can while avoiding any major flaws and using a cut that will display the properties of diamond in their best light, and then cutting the rest into diamonds that can be sold, as well. I believe there was a larger diamond found a while back that had two fairly large diamonds cut out of it because the nature of the uncut diamond made that more profitable and esthetically pleasing than if they had just cut a single larger piece.

Diamonds are interesting and can be pretty, but they're also valued for vastly more than their worth, and there are other very interesting options for jewelry that are neither as expensive nor as ethically dubious as many diamonds are.

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

And then the buyer will probably cut it into whatever number and carat of individual gems will sell for the most - or so I understand.

this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2024
237 points (96.5% liked)

World News

38824 readers
2601 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS