827
submitted 3 months ago by Silverseren@fedia.io to c/politics@lemmy.world

He may not be in office, but Donald Trump has been speaking with the powers that be about Israel’s war on Gaza—but it’s not in an effort to end the genocide.

Instead, Trump has allegedly been talking with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to avert a cease-fire deal, fearing that doing so could help Vice President Kamala Harris win in November, according to PBS.

“The reporting is that former President Trump is on the phone with the Prime Minister of Israel, urging him not to cut a deal right now, because it’s believed that would help the Harris campaign,” said PBS’s Judy Woodruff Monday night. “So, I don’t know where—who knows whether that will come about or not, but I have to think that the Harris campaign would like for President Biden to do what presidents do, and that’s to work on that one.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] knightly@pawb.social 0 points 3 months ago

What are you saying? Are you saying there’s a possibility you’ll vote for trump?

If Trump was able to convince me that he'd stop America's support for genocide then I would.

And until Harris can do the same, the Democrats do not have my fealty.

that’s the only other option… unless you don’t vote.

That is precisely the risk that the Democrat party is taking. If there is no option for voting against genocide, then people like me might not feel enthusiastic about getting out of the house on voting day.

I guess I’m just confused about how are going to get these people to see you.

The same as any organization, public opinion polling:

The party is well aware that the fraction of their base that wants to stay the course on America's national support for genocide is a minority.

That they have not already changed their stance is evidence that they do not see a need to do so. They must be confident that they can win the election without the support of uncommitted voters.

Bet.

[-] SonOfMothman@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

First off, the only one asking for fealty is the republicans. Second, trump already said “finish the job” so obviously he’s not in favor of a cease fire.  

Now we’re right back to voting against your own interests. A not vote for Kamala is a vote for Trump(in a tight race like this)…. who supports the genocide fully… “finish the job”

You have two options. 

  1. vote for an administration that has called for a cease fire and is working to get it. Not doing a great job at it but the alternative is…

  2. Vote for the administration that has said “finish the job” fully supporting the genocide and not calling for a cease fire.

How are you going to not be ignored? If trump wins because people like you don’t vote you’re definitely getting ignored lol. Actually that mother fucker might thank you for helping him get elected.

“If these people won’t do exactly I want then I’m going to make sure I get exactly what I don’t want!” - that’s you, that’s how you sound

Even the poll you just posted shows dems are more in favor of a mutually beneficial outcome, as opposed to(not to beat a dead horse but) “finish the job.

You want to be seen and heard? get out and protest and vote for your best interests. You want to be ignored? Don’t vote. Not voting gives you literally no skin in the game to complain later

Edit:grammar

[-] knightly@pawb.social 0 points 3 months ago

First off, the only one asking for fealty is the republicans.

Incorrect. Democrats have been the only ones demanding my vote. Republicans don't bother trying to convince a "commie queer" like myself.

Second, trump already said “finish the job” so obviously he’s not in favor of a cease fire. 

Likewise, the Democrats who pretend to support a ceasefire but keep authorizing weapons shipments anyway.

Now we’re right back to voting against your own interests. A not vote for Kamala is a vote for Trump(in a tight race like this)…. who supports the genocide fully… “finish the job”

There's those demands for fealty again.

How are you going to not be ignored?

Like this. You're failing to ignore me right now.

“If these people won’t do exactly I want then I’m going to make sure I get exactly what I don’t want!” - that’s you, that’s how you sound

"If these people don't stop asking the Democrats to represent their interests then I'm going to blame them for Trump's second term" - that's you, that's how you sound.

It's as if you've already given up on this election and are looking for some "other" to blame so you don't have to accept the fact that the DNC would rather lose an election than to stop arming Israel.

Even the poll you just posted shows dems are more in favor of a mutually beneficial outcome, as opposed to(not to beat a dead horse but) “finish the job.

And yet, the Democrats would rather stay the course than to do the thing that would net them more votes. By your own logic, the party is not doing everything it can to maximize its chances in the election.

You want to be seen and heard? get out and protest and vote for your best interests.

I'm doing exactly that. You're responding to my protest now. We have an opportunity for productive dialogue and you risk squandering it with manipulative rhetoric. It is not possible to guilt a single-issue anti-genocide voter into tolerating genocide, but it might be possible to convince your political party that it needs to take a more principled stance on the topic.

You want to be ignored? Don’t vote.

Telling people I'm not going to vote has resulted in far more productive and nuanced conversations like this than a promise to vote ever has.

Not voting gives you literally no skin in the game to complain later

On the contrary, voters are the ones with no standing to complain, because they voted for it. Only the non-voting majority of Americans can claim that they are not represented by the political establishment.

[-] SonOfMothman@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Funny enough it’s seems I ignored you lol

Democrats demanding you vote… for your own best interests. The last part is the kicker. If you feel that’s Trump fine. A non vote is still using your vote, and if doesn’t get you what you want…

[-] knightly@pawb.social -1 points 3 months ago

Genocide isn't in my best interests.

If there is no option on the ballot to stop sponsoring genocide then I'm not getting what I want regardless of how I vote.

If the Democrats feel that Trump is a threatening-enough stick that they don't need to offer a carrot, then that's their problem.

[-] SonOfMothman@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Hey we talked about the Gaza atrocities before. Have you watched the latest debate and if so has your opinion changed about voting? Not trying to pressure just genuinely curious

Sorry for not replying until now, I didn’t have a response for you. You made me think.

[-] knightly@pawb.social 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

No worries for the late reply, and I haven't watched the debate or even followed any of the coverage. To be honest, I've mostly checked out of the election since it's become a fait accompli.

I'll do my research on the local candidates when my ballot comes in the mail but I'll be leaving the choice for president blank. Harris will win the election anyway.

[-] SonOfMothman@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

If Palestine is destroyed all the blood is on your hands now. If trump helps Netanyahu it’s your fault

[-] knightly@pawb.social 1 points 3 weeks ago

If you trusted the Democrats to save them, that's your fault.

[-] SonOfMothman@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

If you trusted trump not kill propel he said he would that’s your fault

[-] knightly@pawb.social 1 points 3 weeks ago

When did I ever imply that?

[-] SonOfMothman@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

You voted against your best interests, now a rapist felon is going to give us real the go ahead and kill an entire people… you should feel like a murderer because you are one

[-] knightly@pawb.social 1 points 3 weeks ago

Sounds like someone is looking for someone to blame so that they don't have to reckon with the Democrats' failure to appeal to the voters.

If you want to blame me, that's your problem. I ended up voting for Harris anyway.

[-] SonOfMothman@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Yep just like you did lol. Blood is now on your hands dumb dumb

Sorry don’t believe you.

[-] knightly@pawb.social 1 points 3 weeks ago

Yep just like you did lol.

Pardon?

[-] SonOfMothman@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

this is now all on you when trump helps finish the job. Good job killing the rest of the Palestinians! Disgusting people like you are why there is so much killing in the world, you fucking pushed for this and now you got it. Fucking loser fuck. I hope no one you know dies from this… but they will and you helped kill them

[-] knightly@pawb.social 1 points 3 weeks ago

You're proving my point. My whole state voted for Harris but the Democrats still lost because they didn't oppose genocide.

The people killing palestinians have names and addresses. Go bug them instead of the people who warned you that the Democrats weren't on your side.

this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2024
827 points (97.7% liked)

politics

19148 readers
1922 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS