688
submitted 3 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Donald Trump is trying to brush off the fact that he shared A.I.-generated images of Taylor Swift endorsing his campaign to his Truth Social account earlier this week, now claiming that he doesn’t know “anything about them.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

Rowling used to seem like a "good billionaire" too. Then she went all TERF-y.

Swift may seem cool for now, but let's not put away the guillotines just yet.

[-] finley@lemm.ee 34 points 3 months ago

Not if you read her work, she didn’t. It was filled with racist tropes.

[-] Chocrates@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I am just starting to see that, after having grown up on it. Any recommendations on good analysis's?

[-] Typhoonigator@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

I'm a fan of Alton Brown and Kenji López-Alt

[-] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Americas test kitchen/cooks country is great. Internet shaquille is also excellent.

[-] Chocrates@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago
[-] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 months ago

I'm fine with that. The guillotine can always stay our regardless of who it is and.how much we currently like them.

[-] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

Okay? Everyone seems fine until they don't seem fine. That's not unique to billionaires or particularly insightful.

No one's canonizing anyone here. Saying there's a difference between "one of the most popular musicians ever" having a lot of money and "exploitative businessman notable for particularly exploitative working situations" who has two orders of magnitude more isn't some preening hero worship.

this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2024
688 points (98.3% liked)

politics

19229 readers
1288 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS