362
submitted 2 years ago by SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

The Chinese studio granted early access on the condition that topics like “feminist propaganda” and “Covid-19” go unmentioned. What followed is the Streisand effect in full force.

“I feel that it only served to bring more attention on Game Science’s culture of sexism,” linktothepabst says. “All they had to do was let the game speak for itself, but it came off, to me, like an own goal, effectively stoking the flames between the people who were using this game as weapon against ‘wokeness in games’ and those who can level-headedly either enjoy the game and criticize GS or just ignore the game altogether.”

It’s the Streisand effect in full force: Try to hide something, and it becomes all the more visible. “Nobody was going to bring up Chinese politics unprompted,” Zhong says, “but the topic was there as soon as they released those guidelines.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] cygnus@lemmy.ca 123 points 2 years ago

China has a weird approach to misogyny. Women are both empowered and belittled, and it's all over the media. Anybody who's read the three body problem trilogy (especially book 3) can attest to this.

[-] Glemek@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago

Especially book 3?? I stopped reading after the second because it was too much, it gets worse? wtf

[-] cygnus@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 years ago

Yes, so much worse, directed at both men for not being manly enough and women for being... well, not manly men.

[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

I wrote off the novel when the author said that the Chinese people weren't ready for democracy

[-] Lumisal@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago
[-] Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 2 years ago

The start of this very short thread is:

China has a weird approach to misogyny.

I assume that's what gets worse.

[-] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 2 years ago

The video series tried so hard to downplay that aspect of the books, but it felt like their overall plan was to plaster over & repaint the stains... until the whole thing was rotted through and the mask just slid right off. 😬

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago

Don't bother with video series.

Read the content to enjoy what value exists, and criticize what issues exist. Reading is not voting or aligning, it's observing.

[-] Cagi@lemmy.ca 26 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I agree, but with a caveat. Pirate things from people who publicly espouse shitty views. Purchasing it is justifying it. JK Rowling has explicitly said she feels more empowered to be awful because people keep buying Harry Potter stuff.

[-] TheBananaKing@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

Fandom is endorsement; the HP IP has become a huge anti-trans flag.

Every time people invoke it, they wave that flag some more, and mark it as an acceptable thing to stand under.

Let it die, both financially and culturally.

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago
[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 7 points 2 years ago

We're talking about pirating books? Nah, go to a library. They need the numbers to get funding.

[-] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago

All of what you said is true, and I mildly regret giving the video series a chance, NGL. Also, that last bit doesn't really jive with totalitarian states like PRC's China. 😶

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Huh? What do you mean about the last bit

[-] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago

Reading is not voting or aligning

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Oh, well, fuckem, why would I consider them?

I don't think about totalitarian states at all, outside of specific conversations about em

[-] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago

Because, that's where the author is from? 😶

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago

That's fair but my original comment in thread was my personal opinion on consuming written content.

[-] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I'm not sure you're grasping the weight of the fact that such a work of post-hunanism fiction even made it out of China at all, given the government's centuries-long tradition of heavily-filtering "art" in every form...

(edit: I'm leaving the misspelling in for the stupid pun.)

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago

No, I agree, that's of interest. But my comment was my opinion about how the rest of us can consume written media.

[-] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 years ago

Oh, I didn't know that you were excluding 1.4B people in the general statement. My bad. 😅

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Obviously as a western commenter, sharing my own opinion on media consumption, I'm only speaking to the sphere of ... Reality, which I inhabit.

[-] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 years ago

There's so much to unpack there. 😅

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Who cares?

Like I didn't think of the Taliban when I wrote it either.

Shared my opinion for the world I live in.

[-] Birch@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I read the whole series and somehow missed this, I did chalk up a lot of things to "must be a chinese cultural thing", like the whole idea of all nations actually working together or globally banning "escapism" and just suspended my disbelief, so maybe I glossed over that bit as well. Is there a good article that dives into this?

E: Found this article, that goes into it as well as other issues, well worth a read

this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2024
362 points (93.9% liked)

News

36628 readers
582 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS