238

Subscription fatigue: when will enough be enough? (fedia.io)

submitted 3 months ago by Treedrake@fedia.io to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

82 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I think a common factor on why torrents are having a resurgence and illegal streaming services are getting more traction, is subscription fatigue. Subscription fatigue doesn't only contain itself to streaming services, movies or music, nowadays you're also expected to subscribe to every app you download. Whether it's a meditation app, a budgeting app (looking at YNAB that went from a one-time purchase to a really expensive subscription model), the Adobe suite, the MS Office suite, your Peloton bike that you've already paid hundreds of dollars for (referencing the earlier article on them establishing a startup fee for buying used bikes), or a podcast app where the money doesn't even go to the podcasters themselves.

Is there a peak for this? I feel like subscriptions are becoming more of a rule than an exception. Having the ability to directly purchase digital goods seems more like a thing of the past. It's just so stupid. But apparently people don't care? They just keep paying for this? Apparently it's still worth it for companies to establish a subscription model, even if there are no benefits for the customer, just the company. What are your thoughts? What can we do to stop it?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] xilliah@beehaw.org 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

What are your thoughts on ownership?

I feel a subscription model takes power away from me. Just like UBI would.

It just seems like a bad idea long term.

[-] Loulou@lemmy.mindoki.com 13 points 3 months ago

Would Universal Basic Income take power away from you?

Like you personally?

Or is UBI meaning something else too?

[-] akashihi@lemmy.wtf 3 points 3 months ago

I think it was a "UBIsoft" , a game publishing company.

[-] Loulou@lemmy.mindoki.com 3 points 3 months ago

OMG I'm an idiot. Thank you!

[-] xilliah@beehaw.org -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Yeah because it takes away leverage from unions.

It's better to have national shares, so everyone owns the production, and that provides your income. But ya now I am probably a commie?

[-] Steve@communick.news 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

How does it take leverage from unions?
It would effectively be a permanent strike fund.
Wouldn't that help unions?

It's also not so much "taking" power, as it's not giving power you feel is your right.
Which, is the same kind of thinking that let's copyright holders claim every count of piracy is theft of money they never actually had.

[-] xilliah@beehaw.org -2 points 3 months ago

I didn't understand the second part, could you elaborate on that?

How do you imagine unions to function at all without workers? The work is what provides unions with leverage, which is why we see strikes even in countries that have really good laws.

If you receive UBI, what can you do that genuinely creates leverage? Maybe make blockades like XR does? I don't think that's as powerful.

[-] Steve@communick.news 9 points 3 months ago

If there aren't workers, there is no need for unions.

But that doesn't happen anyway.
UBI doesn't replace work. People still work. Pilot programs and tests show, people might work less overtime, or call out when sick more, so they can go to a doctor, spend more time home with a new baby, and stay in school longer gaining higher degrees. But they don't quit their jobs. So there will still be plenty of workers to join unions.

[-] xilliah@beehaw.org 2 points 3 months ago

Ya that makes sense. I guess it was kinda black and white to me and I was thinking of what's called Basic in The Expanse.

[-] tias@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 3 months ago

Depends what kind of ownership you're thinking about. When it comes to electronics, "ownership" is just subscription with a longer period between payments. Your existing phone, tablet, TV, dishwasher or what have you will last a finite time and then you have to buy a new one.

If there's something that will last a lifetime, that's a different discussion. But those are rare. Almost every purchase you make is a commitment to a recurring cost.

[-] xilliah@beehaw.org 7 points 3 months ago

That's an interesting perspective, and it makes sense for certain objects.

I also disagree with something you're implying. If you build a proper headphones it will last forever. It's a symptom of a broken system to create headphones that break every 3 years. That applies to many objects that I can think of right now.

[-] tias@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I agree that the current system is broken. So let's say that instead of paying $300 for a pair of headphones that last three years, you pay $8.33 / month for renting the headphones. Now, if the headphones break after three years the manufacturer has to produce new ones for you. That's an undesirable cost for them.

It is now in their best interest to make headphones that will last a long time and that they can repair if something breaks. But also, since you can easily cancel the subscription at any time, it is in their interest to offer you something that is competitive. They might even upgrade to better technology over time or add new features to the bundled app to keep you as a customer. Or alternatively, lower the subscription cost over time to reflect the relative value of the headphones.

For you, there's also the benefit that there's no high upfront cost that you can't reverse. You're paying for what you can afford in your current situation. If you lose your job you can stop paying for the headphones at a moment's notice. I imagine that this would leave fewer people in credit card debt.

[-] xilliah@beehaw.org 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Or we could fix the system and I have the right information as customer to be able to purchase a headphones that lasts long and can be repaired.

I'd argue we need a market that provides more useful information to the customer.

For example I'd like to know what environmental impact my products have. How long I'll be able to get replacement parts. Longer guarantees perhaps. The ability to upgrade. I'm not an expert on the details.

At the moment I'd prefer to own rather than to rent. Quite frankly what you're imagining sounds dystopian to me because you lose power.