255
submitted 2 months ago by some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org to c/news@lemmy.world

I'm so glad I'm not growing up in this age of smartphones, social media, and bullshit generators. Life was hell enough in the 90s without all that noise.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 31 points 2 months ago

TBH kids need a new culture/attititude towards digital media, where they basically assume anything they consume on their phones is likely bogus. Like a whole new layer of critical thinking.

I think it's already shifting this direction with the popularity of private chats at the expense of "public" social media.

[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago

Yep, at this point your real nudes could leak and you can just plausibly claim they’re faked.

Something will change, but I’m not sure where society will decide to land on this topic.

[-] garpujol@discuss.online 4 points 2 months ago

Unless you have a birthmark no one knew about 😳

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 months ago

If no one knows about it you could claim not to have it.

[-] leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 2 months ago

Birthmarks don't seem like the kind of thing AI would generate (unless asked), though...

(And, as model collapse sets in and generated images become more and more generic and average, things like birthmarks will become more and more unlikely...)

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

AI is quite unpredictable... it's sort of only useful because of how random it is. But my point is that either the knowledge is public or private - there's no situation where you can't either deny or attribute it to public knowledge.

[-] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

That's definitely going to happen organically, especially since this is a genie that is definitely never going back in the bottle. It's only going to become more convincing, more accessible, and more widespread, even for simply 'self-contained' use, especially by hormone-flooded teenagers.

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Even if all AI developement is outlawed, this minute, everywhere, the genie is already out of the bottle. Flux 1.dev is bascially photorealsitic for many situations, and there will always be someone hosting it in some sketchy jurisdiction.

[-] kibiz0r@midwest.social 1 points 2 months ago

I kinda doubt anyone is getting “fooled” by these at this point, though that is a whole nother layer of horrible hell in store for us…

Right now, we’re dealing with the most basic questions:

  • Is it immoral (and/or should it be illegal) for people to be trading pornographic approximations of you?
  • Is it immoral (and/or should it be illegal) for people to privately make pornographic approximations of you?
  • Is it immoral (and/or should it be illegal) to distribute software which allows people to make pornographic approximations of others?
[-] yeather@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago
  1. Illegal
  2. Immoral
  3. If built specifially for? Illegal. If it’s a tool with proper blockages that ends up having a way to break away and make them anyway? No.
this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2024
255 points (93.2% liked)

News

23287 readers
1254 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS