529
submitted 2 months ago by n3cr0@lemmy.world to c/programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 38 points 2 months ago

You need to merge more often.

Rebase. That's where the real trauma is.

[-] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 24 points 2 months ago

Neither rebasing nor merging should cause trauma if everyone on the team takes a day or two to understand git

[-] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 months ago

I consider myself above average in terms of Git know how. But I've come across situations using rebase where you're stuck resolving the same conflicts over several commits.

I still don't understand that part quite well.

This doesn't happen when you do a normal merge though. Making it easier to manage

[-] furikuri@programming.dev 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

You could try making enabling git's rerere functionality, which stands for "reuse recorded resolution"

https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Git-Tools-Rerere

https://stackoverflow.com/a/49501436

[-] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

Yeah I saw someone else's answer and I totally learned something new today.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2024
529 points (97.1% liked)

Programmer Humor

32476 readers
598 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS