612
submitted 3 months ago by nzmaa@lemy.lol to c/greentext@sh.itjust.works
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] miau@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I guess since in many cases you do actually need to roll a dice, like when peeforming a touch or ranged touch spell, people just assume it always happens.

And even in this case. Cure wounds is a spell like any other and it is subject to a will saving throw. So to be correct the pc that was targeted by the spell would indeed roll in order to save from the unintended heal - but thats really just assuming the spell could be used like this, which in my interpretation it cannot.

So again, even if the caster rolls no dice in this case, the target could. I think this leads to people thinking there must always be a roll.

Edit: fix paragraphs

[-] Apollo42@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Will isn't an attribute/stat in dnd 5e and the only roll one would make for cure wounds is the amount of healing applied.

[-] miau@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 3 months ago

Thats not what I said.

Never played 5e but in 3.5e the target of the spell - not the spellcaster - can roll a dice. The target can perform a will save to reduce healing amount by half.

this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2024
612 points (95.3% liked)

Greentext

4494 readers
747 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS