731
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] frezik@midwest.social 112 points 2 months ago

Just wait until GabeN retires and the inheritors of Valve start to enshittify it. Unless GabeN had a good succession plan in place, or GoG can swoop in and become the new standard, things might get rough. I might stick to retro games from then on.

[-] Flipper@feddit.org 17 points 2 months ago

Why should they enshitify a service that is printing money with minimal effort? Right guys 🥲.

[-] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 37 points 2 months ago

because they don't understand why it's printing money

[-] thesporkeffect@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Not only do they not understand, they actively don't care: they have a product-agnostic business process that can convert any type of stable business into a pile of extracted equity and spare parts. They are literally bleeding their own society to death

At least actual vampires would probably have the good sense not to destroy the breeding stock that keeps them alive.

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago

Because most of these MBA fucks don't understand the concept of piracy being a service problem. They have run perfectly fine systems into the ground because they insist on making it infinitely harder to use legit services than to just rip shit off.

[-] Flipper@feddit.org 3 points 2 months ago

Like the 28. Streaming service, so that I can't find what I want anymore.

[-] pressanykeynow@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Yeah, the thing about Steam is that buying your game at Steam feels better than downloading it for free somehow.

[-] fatalicus@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Because they could make it print even more money, and make the line go more up for a very short time!

That looks good on the CV you know.

[-] kiljoy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 months ago

Because it could be printing even MOAR money. Line must go up at all cost.

[-] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

Supposedly the answer is inflation. The same profit next year is worth less, so it needs to go up to be the same.

Of course thats not where most companies stop, is it.

[-] kiljoy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The thing that pisses me off if that my comp only goes up by 3% but that is failure to a corp.

[-] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

Thats interesting, I hadn't connected those before. I think it would be hard to argue in favor of separate expectations for inflation of wages and the companies profits.

Like I understand having a stellar year, but the goal is still set the same, and its fine to return tk that baseline next year. Or maybe even doing well one year means we can lower the goal next year, or bank the difference for bad weather years.

Would be interesting if companies had an interest in the long term like that.

load more comments (26 replies)
this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2024
731 points (97.5% liked)

Gaming

3118 readers
23 users here now

!gaming is a community for gaming noobs through gaming aficionados. Unlike !games, we don’t take ourselves quite as serious. Shitposts and memes are welcome.

Our Rules:

1. Keep it civil.


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only.


2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry.


I should not need to explain this one.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month.


Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.



Logo uses joystick by liftarn

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS