249

Does AAAA just mean awful triple A games now? (lemm.ee)

submitted 2 months ago by delitomatoes@lemm.ee to c/games@lemmy.world

74 comments fedilink hide all child comments

It seems the general direction the internet is going and I'm all for it

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] sirico@feddit.uk 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I would say I really enjoyed Sony's games the last few years but they also don't seem to be able to tell their non-creatives to STFU and are damaging their games recently so I'm inclined to agree.

Ohh Capcom are still good...right?!

[-] DacoTaco@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Oh sweet summer child. Capcom is on a very sharp edge imo.
Their games are solid, but everything around it is utter god damn dogshit.
Sf5? Beta was very solid, was fucked up before release. Also had a terrible microtransactions system.
Sf6? Very very solid base game, but to get all character and stages since last year + the game you have to pay +160 euro.
Re4? Very solid remake, but prepare to loose performance on pc due to dunovo despite it being a single player game.
Re: the village? Very solid game, but better pay shit up and also loose performance despite ALSO being a single player game.
Megaman: mega who?
Monster hunter : safe, for now. Monster hunter wilds looks amazing and loads of fun, but watch them fuck it up somehow..

I like capcom a lot, have always supported them despite shit decisions and a few near bankruptcies but its the microtransactions/usage of dunovo and other weird ass decisions is making me hold back on buying their stuff atm..

[-] Varyag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago

Monster Hunter and Devil May Cry and Dragon Age: full of insipid, unnecessary microtransactions ranging from regular consumable items, to cosmetics that were usually just included with the game normally. God I love Capcom's games but I hate them as a company.