16
submitted 2 months ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to c/globalnews@lemmy.zip

Justice Department officials are turning to the 3D-printing industry to help stop the proliferation of tiny pieces of plastic transforming semi-automatic weapons into illegal homemade machine guns on streets across America.

Archived version: https://archive.is/FzBzV

SpinScore: https://spinscore.io/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fapnews.com%2Farticle%2Fmachine-gun-conversion-devices-justice-department-7bcdd06bcccc987c90da494f746d5765

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Garbanzo@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago

“Law enforcement cannot do this alone,” Monaco said during a gathering in Washington of federal law enforcement officials, members of the 3D-printing industry and academia. “We need to engage software developers, technology experts and leaders in the 3-D-printing industry to identify solutions in this fight.”

Good luck with that, it's basically impossible. The best they could hope to do is have commercial printing services watch for and refuse to print the devices. Anyone can look up the patent for a Glock switch and design and print one themselves. It can't be blocked on the printer level because that would require the printer to be a lot smarter than they currently are, and any such blocking could be bypassed by building a printer from scratch (not easy, but totally doable).

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

And it would require all printers to be closed-source, else people would just patch out the "is this a glock switch?" check.

The anti-counterfeiting EURion constellation (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EURion_constellation) works because most printers are made by a handful of established companies. 3D printers, on the other hand, are made by dozens of tiny companies, many of whom are Chinese companies buying similar source parts and adding their own touches, and those companies don't give a shit about American law beyond the bare minimum to make a sale.

[-] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Plus it's not like fully automatic is really all that useful, as the military can attest.

They don't even use full auto on the standard issue rifles - at most there's a burst option, because full auto is inaccurate.

Full auto, because it's inaccurate, is mostly useful for suppressive fire. I've shot full auto 7mm and 223. 7mm is just spray and pray, 223 slightly more controllable, but still you'd have to be an exceptional operator to be accurate. The recoil of 7mm for a single round is staggering, let alone full auto.

So the question then becomes - if they want to prevent full auto conversion (something of questionable usability), why?

Oh, that's right. It's about surveillance and control.

[-] unmagical@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 months ago

If your goal is to dump as many mags as possible into a crowd then your aim and recoil don't matter that much.

[-] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

mostly useful for suppressive fire

I think the concern is about a shooter firing into a dense crowd (like the Las Vegas attack) which is generally an application that would not come up during military use.

[-] Gerudo@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

While I agree that it's completely impractical for accuracy, there have been many crimes committed with a switch and 30 round mags. It's not accurate, but it will 100% be an efficient killing device in a crowd. Which has happened.

this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2024
16 points (94.4% liked)

Interesting Global News

2613 readers
1234 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS