599
submitted 2 months ago by Stopthatgirl7@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

A school district in northeast Florida must put back in libraries three dozen books as part of a settlement reached Thursday with students and parents who sued over what they said was an unlawful decision to limit access to dozens of titles containing LGBTQ+ content.

Under the agreement the School Board of Nassau County must restore access to three dozen titles including “And Tango Makes Three,” a children’s picture book based on a true story about two male penguins that raised a chick together at New York’s Central Park Zoo. Authors Peter Parnell and Justin Richardson were plaintiffs in the lawsuit against the district, which is about 35 miles (about 60 kilometers) northeast of Jacksonville along the Georgia border.

The suit was one of several challenges to book bans since state lawmakers last year passed, and Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis signed into law, legislation making it easier to challenge educational materials that opponents consider pornographic and obscene. Last month six major publishers and several well-known authors filed a federal lawsuit in Orlando arguing that some provisions of the law violate the First Amendment rights of publishers, authors and students.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 143 points 2 months ago

Imagine seeing a true story about penguins and deciding it's gay propoganda

[-] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 29 points 2 months ago

And also, how has the US got itself into a position where LGBTQ+ needs to be suppressed? Gay or not, why should these homophobic politicians get to decide what the children can be exposed to without involving the parents in the decision.

[-] FinalRemix@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago

Because they're probably closeted themselves, and it makes them feel things.

[-] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Seriously tho I had a teacher in high school who straight up said he'd date men if it wasn't against his religion. Guess who he voted for

[-] irotsoma@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Because we have such a large number of people convinced that love is "obscene" and that love and sex are for procreation only and shouldn't be talked about except to congratulate people who are making babies. But mostly because the people pushing those ideas are people have never truly loved anyone other than themselves and/or want to rape without consequence.

[-] Silentiea@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 months ago

"Love" is fine, but it can't be gay without sex being involved, so two dads == obscene. Clearly there's no sex involved in hetero~~sexual~~ relationships in children's books, but there must be in those LGBTQ+ books. Why else would they be banned?

-Florida lawmakers, probably

[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

And also, how has the US got itself into a position where LGBTQ+ needs to be suppressed?

By folks voting for and supporting Republicans. This is the simple, undeniable answer.

[-] TheBat@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago
[-] Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 months ago

Propaganda.

So, 'propagaynda'.

[-] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Like Stephen Colbert said, "reality has a well-known liberal bias.":

[-] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Man I wish I could have been there. That sounds incredible.

this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2024
599 points (99.2% liked)

News

23406 readers
2464 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS