599

A school district in northeast Florida must put back in libraries three dozen books as part of a settlement reached Thursday with students and parents who sued over what they said was an unlawful decision to limit access to dozens of titles containing LGBTQ+ content.

Under the agreement the School Board of Nassau County must restore access to three dozen titles including “And Tango Makes Three,” a children’s picture book based on a true story about two male penguins that raised a chick together at New York’s Central Park Zoo. Authors Peter Parnell and Justin Richardson were plaintiffs in the lawsuit against the district, which is about 35 miles (about 60 kilometers) northeast of Jacksonville along the Georgia border.

The suit was one of several challenges to book bans since state lawmakers last year passed, and Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis signed into law, legislation making it easier to challenge educational materials that opponents consider pornographic and obscene. Last month six major publishers and several well-known authors filed a federal lawsuit in Orlando arguing that some provisions of the law violate the First Amendment rights of publishers, authors and students.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 143 points 2 years ago

Imagine seeing a true story about penguins and deciding it's gay propoganda

[-] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 29 points 1 year ago

And also, how has the US got itself into a position where LGBTQ+ needs to be suppressed? Gay or not, why should these homophobic politicians get to decide what the children can be exposed to without involving the parents in the decision.

[-] FinalRemix@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Because they're probably closeted themselves, and it makes them feel things.

[-] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Seriously tho I had a teacher in high school who straight up said he'd date men if it wasn't against his religion. Guess who he voted for

[-] irotsoma@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Because we have such a large number of people convinced that love is "obscene" and that love and sex are for procreation only and shouldn't be talked about except to congratulate people who are making babies. But mostly because the people pushing those ideas are people have never truly loved anyone other than themselves and/or want to rape without consequence.

[-] Silentiea@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago

"Love" is fine, but it can't be gay without sex being involved, so two dads == obscene. Clearly there's no sex involved in hetero~~sexual~~ relationships in children's books, but there must be in those LGBTQ+ books. Why else would they be banned?

-Florida lawmakers, probably

[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And also, how has the US got itself into a position where LGBTQ+ needs to be suppressed?

By folks voting for and supporting Republicans. This is the simple, undeniable answer.

[-] TheBat@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago
[-] Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 years ago

Propaganda.

So, 'propagaynda'.

[-] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Like Stephen Colbert said, "reality has a well-known liberal bias.":

[-] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Man I wish I could have been there. That sounds incredible.

this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2024
599 points (99.2% liked)

News

36366 readers
878 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS