Thanks. Interesting thoughts.

A) is an opinion and it was stated as an opinion, since the post served in place of the discussion that was skipped. I feel justified in sharing my opinion about the direction I want the community to take. I can't force my views on anyone, and it seems amazingly insecure to respond to that with a unilateral de-mod.

B) was a request for patience and discussion before people started de-modding each other. But okay, let's call it "downplaying" for the sake of argument. I don't see how such downplaying amounts to justification to de-mod me.

C) I can't respond to but I do find it rather uncharitable. If you can give an example, I'd appreciate that. And D) I can never assure someone who wishes to believe otherwise.

When it comes down to it, it sounds like you are saying the other mod was justified in de-modding me because I voiced disagreement with his choices. Plus a bunch of other stuff about me just plain not deserving to be a mod for reasons I admit I don't grasp; that I'm just intrinsically deserving of being de-modded. Have I got it?