163
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] hedidwot@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 1 year ago

All of this skills the point. This is a second drive that failed, it was the replacement for an earlier drive that failed.

That's what the article is all about.

A high, unexpected and unreasonable failure rate.

[-] furrowsofar@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

I had a high failure rate in some Seagate drives in the early 00s. Switch vendors and never had the problem again.

We also do no know how they failed. Are they still image readable with ddrescue or spinrite for example or are they truly crashed. It is not clear if they even tried.

this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2023
163 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37754 readers
306 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS