941
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] helenslunch@feddit.nl -3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I'm not gonna answer that question. I don't have the perfect answer ready for you.

That's okay, I don't expect a "perfect" answer, but what you're revealing about yourself by not putting forward an answer is that you don't care about our wants, you're just mad that we're not doing what you want.

People tell me all the time voting is how to get what you want, so that's what I've done and what I'll continue to do.

the Spoiler Effect

Yes, I'm very familiar. Once again, I think this is just manipulating people into your desired outcome. I'm very happy to "spoil" my vote by advocating for someone I actually support, rather than throwing it away on someone I don't. The fault lies with the system, not with me.

[-] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

The fault lies with the system, not with me.

The fuckery inherent in the current system being not your fault does not absolve you from voting responsibly in context of the current system. If you are going to throw in a protest vote you are asserting your portion of responsibility for the practical end result of that vote.

[-] helenslunch@feddit.nl 0 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

It's a good thing I vote responsibly then. An irresponsible vote would be one that perpetuates the current, broken system.

[-] laverabe@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Because there are more effective forms of protest that don’t guarantee with 99.9% accuracy that a fascist is elected if people vote for an alternate party (literally the case this year with the margins, and “dictator day 1”).

Voting should be pragmatic. There are a million other ways to protest/lobby, but honestly the Democrats of today are far more progressive than 20 years ago, because of people who understand the system and change it from the inside, like AOC/Bernie.

[-] helenslunch@feddit.nl 0 points 5 days ago

with 99.9% accuracy that a fascist is elected if people vote for an alternate party

Just straight up blatant lies here.

There are a million other ways to protest/lobby

I can't think of a more powerful protest.

like AOC/Bernie.

I would vote for either in a heartbeat but I can't because they won't be on the ballot. They will step down and insist you vote for Kamala instead. And even if they were you would insist that I not vote for them anyway because it's still "throwing away" my vote.

When either party puts forward a candidate without immediately-disqualifying horrendous traits, I will vote for them. But that absolutely never happens. It is almost always the worst-possible candidate, without even considering their political positions. They all accept massive donations from mega-PACs and a deplorable history of selfishness and lies.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2024
941 points (87.2% liked)

Showerthoughts

29246 readers
544 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The best ones are thoughts that many people can relate to and they find something funny or interesting in regular stuff.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS