2
submitted 1 year ago by tshannon@beehaw.org to c/science@beehaw.org
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] CrateDane@feddit.dk 1 points 1 year ago

It likely is a bit overblown. Moreover, it's a very good point that it's a bad system when it only delineates what confidence there is that a compound can cause cancer, and not how strong the effect is. Lots of things are technically carcinogenic, but with the effect being so weak it's negligible. Technically we already know formaldehyde is a metabolite of aspartame, and that formaldehyde is carcinogenic, but the amounts involved mean it's going to be a very minor contributor to cancer risk.

this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)

Science

13006 readers
45 users here now

Studies, research findings, and interesting tidbits from the ever-expanding scientific world.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS