5

On lemmy.world I posted a comment on how liberals use 'tankie' as an invective to shut down dialogue and received tons of hateful replies. I tried to respond in a rational way to each. Someone's said 'get educated' I responded 'Im reading Norman Finkelstein's I'll burn that bridge when I get there' and tried to keep it civil.

They deleted every comment I made and banned me. Proving my point, they just want to shut down dialogue. Freedom of speech doesn't existing in those 'totalitarian' countries right? But in our 'enlightened' western countries we just delete you.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

Tankie means you approve when a communist state uses military/tanks against its own people... Not against a Nazi state. I would reconsider if you really want to wear that label with pride..

[-] muad_dibber@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Tankie just means "any communist I don't like" at this point. Take your McCarthyism and complete ignorance about color revolutions elsewhere.

[-] Jean_le_Flambeur@discuss.tchncs.de -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Nice definition of tankie! Got that from wish?

[-] IntoDaLagoon@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago

At what point does being clowned on by an entire instance spur self-reflection?

[-] Jean_le_Flambeur@discuss.tchncs.de -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Look what people wrote as replies to my comment, look how the upvote downvote numbers are, think.

My key takeaway from this post is: people on lemmygrad say they are interested in discussion and all those other instances are oh so bad, because they block them or doenvote them or call them tankies, which people on lemmygrad interpret as slur.

At the same time, you get down voted to oblivion, when you even write the definition of tankies to someone, who calls himself one. People who are pride to be a tankies onLemmygrad: cherished People who criticise this in anyway: laught at.

And simultaneously everyone who calls anyone else except him self a tankie no matter the context is automatically a liberal, when Servers defederate them, they are all facists or love fascists

People making strawman arguments when I say in a discussion that I don't agree with Stalin ("ohhh so capitalism is sooo much better" - no, its not, and I didn't say that, I can disagree with capitalism and stlinism at the same time, go figure)

And people defending (literal) tankies get upvoted, people who don't get down voted.

This server has lost one of the strongest tools in material dialectic: (self-) critical thinking

I really hoped I would find interesting debates here, but this is a circlejerk

At what point will self reflection kick in? At what point t people in an echo chamber realise its one?

[-] m532@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Mathematician 1: 1+1=2 Mathematician 2: 1+1=2

Debatebro: Muh echo chamber!

[-] Jean_le_Flambeur@discuss.tchncs.de -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, cause stating "tankie" means "every communist I don't like" is the only truth and like saying 1+1 =2

Also comparing societal questions to mathematical ones is totally unconcerning

/kappa

[-] m532@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Marxism-Leninism is a branch of science. What I'm saying is that we all get the same results because that's how science works.

[-] Jean_le_Flambeur@discuss.tchncs.de -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Everyone who has in interest in science knows that you can't prove opinions, but only facts. You can prove stuff like "capitalism is destroying the ecosystem" or "China masacered the Uigurs" you can't prove stuff like "Stalin was right" or "the bests way to interpret Marx is to consider the context he wrote in"

That's the basic difference between empirical and normative science.

And basically all questions of politics are at least partially normative.

I agree that materialistic dialectics can be used as scientific tools, and are by most people, but science also means, you accept that no one can have the "only true opinion" as empirical facts can be interpreted widely different and no human has ALL information. And even if one had, there are always subjective weightings at play (is human suffering worse than human death? Is animal death worse than human suffering? Is the system more valuable than individual freedoms?)

Science means knowing what you can and can't prove, so if you are scientific, you know that not everybody comes to the same conclusion even when using the same facts.

[-] m532@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago

So what's your problem then? The tanks were sent and the nazis were crushed. Also, krushchev sent the tanks, not stalin. What's your problem with stalin?

What's my problem with Stalin?

I could not have described my problem with talking to people here better than you demonstrated it in this simple question, even if I would have used 100 words.

[-] m532@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah it seems the problem is that you are a liberal. You calling us woke is a sign of being a wrecker.

Ahaha it gets better every comment. -(Wrong) Assumtions about my political believes -ranting about stuff I day don't even say (classical strawman)

This is a joke that just keeps on giving :D

[-] m532@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago

It's in the title. It's the new woke.

Try reading what thread you're in first.

Also: Would you send tanks into hungary?

Yeah, but I didn't say anywhere that I agree with the OPs on the other server.

I think the word tankie gets used inflationary by centrists that don't know what it means, but that's not what u want to think. You want to put me in a box in your heads ;)

[-] IntoDaLagoon@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago

You want to put me in a box in your heads ;)

Hey Mr. Actually Laughing, that's what you came in here to do. Don't want to fit in the box? Don't be a square

[-] Jean_le_Flambeur@discuss.tchncs.de -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oh I don't do, and really don't need to prove that to some online bible stalinists. But its funny what your dogma glasses let you think is a square ^^

[-] m532@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago

"Noooo I am totally not a liberal! I am an anarcho-bidenist-gonzaloite with juan guaido characteristics"

-liberals wanting to not be called liberals

[-] m532@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago

That's what a liberal would say.

A liberal would also dodge all questions that make imperialists uncomfortable, like whether they would send tanks into hungary.

And it just goes on. But I do dodge the questions, I'll give you that. I'll even tell you why: I came here to have interesting discussions on how to create a better society. Communists are in the defense and neoliberalism is omnipresent, connecting and organising are more important then ever, part of connecting is sharing experiences with others online. But after I was in this community for 10 min. I realized, that I won't get that here. Majority of people here is just trying to vilanise everyone who remotely challenges their believes, put them in a box and then being proud they stand up against someone bad. So recently I'm just doing it for the fun and giggles (and therefore not putting effort in answering difficult questions which are actually complicated). The way people really think they are making a point when in reality they just show their own superiority complex isquite entertaining after all.

[-] m532@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago

But the question about sending tanks is important because with this we could weed out nazi enablers.

Sure, because there is only black and white. Either you choose violence in every scenario or u are Nazi lover.

Flawless logic.

[-] m532@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So this means you would not send the tanks?

The nazis will now put all non-nazis in hungary into concentration camps.

Nazi enabler.

Edit: You could have avoided most of the violence (that the nazis will inflict on innocent people now) by sending the tanks.

[-] IntoDaLagoon@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago

There's that empty liberal appeal to an assumed normative opinion again, combined with "uhh actually you have now proven my nebulous non-point by asking a basic question"

My man is floundering

[-] CannotSleep420@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Jean le Flambeur? More like Jean le Flounder.

[-] zigguroth@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago

gonna need proof of "China masacered[sic] the Uigurs[sic]" that doesn't cite the far-right extremist Falun Gong cult, its "news" site The Epoch Times, or its Western mouthpiece, fundamentalist evangelical Christian pastor Adrian Zenz.

[-] lemmyseizethemeans@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 1 year ago

At least nobody is actually deleting your comments. When I posted the original thing to lemmy.world about how the word 'tankie' is used to stop all discourse, and then responded with many points, they deleted everything. As in poof no dialogue at all. At least we are all reading your words and responding. The downvotes don't mean anything other than there is disagreement with the conclusions of the argument is all. I say keep talking! I will upvote all your stuff. It is all about dialogue.

[-] IntoDaLagoon@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

For real, they complain about "authoritarian tankies and their echo chambers" when we're not even censoring them like they do to us, they just can't handle being shown to be wrong.

You can't be an echo chamber because others are worse, that's your argument?

I have not been shown wrong, under this post I was agressivly told "that tankie means everyone you don't agree with", that "everyone who uses the word tankie is a lib and therefore wrong." Execept you call yourself one, then you get cherished and upvoted) , and it was implied, that I love Nazis if I don't agree with the people here.

Lots of people made lots of claims, but there wasn't anything shown let alone proven.

That's no discussion culture, that's a "have my opinion or get out" culture.

[-] m532@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago

and it was implied, that I love Nazis if I don’t agree with the people here.

Just admit that you didn't know about the nazis in hungary, and you can still get out without being called a nazi enabler

Yeah, but there is no real dialogue with most people here. Even if its just a question about what a word means.

Me: tankie comes from tanks They: no it means "commie I don't like" Me:that's not what most people think of when hearing the word, there can be different opinions about using tanks against civilians They: "so you love Nazis?"

That's not what I understand to be an discussion. A discussion would mean listening to the other party and trying to understand. With most people here its either like talking to a wall or talking with someone who's hobby it is building strawman arguments

[-] m532@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I'll say it again:

If you don’t send tanks into hungary, the nazis will do pogroms and construct concentration camps there. Not sending tanks is inhumanly cruel.

[-] IntoDaLagoon@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago

You're not here for a dialogue, you're here because of a nagging sense of being complicit in something monstrous that compels you to justify your shallow beliefs and corrosive way of life by spewing half-digested propaganda at people discussing the problem.

Ahaha I wish you could read this from my perspective. You guys are so funny desperately trying to prove I'm a fascist/lib/nazi.

All the baseless assumptions you need to make to keep your blissfully "I'm the hero and everyone else is dumb" mindset.

Its just comedy gold

[-] m532@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Would you send tanks?

[-] m532@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 year ago

If you don't send tanks into hungary, the nazis will do pogroms and construct concentration camps there. Not sending tanks is inhumanly cruel.

I 100% agree, and tho I very much like Stalin(he’s my favorite writer) it doesn’t take a “Stalinist” to understand that Color Revolutions and Nazism need to be crushed for socialism to survive

load more comments (34 replies)
load more comments (34 replies)
load more comments (49 replies)
this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2023
5 points (100.0% liked)

Communism

9360 readers
2 users here now

Discussion Community for fellow Marxist-Leninists and other Marxists.

Rules for /c/communism

Rules that visitors must follow to participate. May be used as reasons to report or ban.

  1. No non-marxists

This subreddit is here to facilitate discussion between marxists.

There are other communities aimed at helping along new communists. This community isn't here to convert naysayers to marxism.

If you are a member of the police, armed forces, or any other part of the repressive state apparatus of capitalist nations, you will be banned.

  1. No oppressive language

Do not attempt to justify your use of oppressive language.

Doing this will almost assuredly result in a ban. Accept the criticism in a principled manner, edit your post or comment accordingly, and move on, learning from your mistake.

We believe that speech, like everything else, has a class character, and that some speech can be oppressive. This is why speech that is patriarchal, white supremacist, cissupremacist, homophobic, ableist, or otherwise oppressive is banned.

TERF is not a slur.

  1. No low quality or off-topic posts

Posts that are low-effort or otherwise irrelevant will be removed.

This is not a place to engage in meta-drama or discuss random reactionaries on lemmy or anywhere else.

This includes memes and circlejerking.

This includes most images, such as random books or memorabilia you found.

We ask that amerikan posters refrain from posting about US bourgeois politics. The rest of the world really doesn’t care that much.

  1. No basic questions about marxism

Posts asking entry-level questions will be removed.

Questions like “What is Maoism?” or “Why do Stalinists believe what they do?” will be removed, as they are not the focus on this forum.

  1. No sectarianism

Marxists of all tendencies are welcome here.

Refrain from sectarianism, defined here as unprincipled criticism. Posts trash-talking a certain tendency or marxist figure will be removed. Circlejerking, throwing insults around, and other pettiness is unacceptable.

If criticisms must be made, make them in a principled manner, applying Marxist analysis.

The goal of this subreddit is the accretion of theory and knowledge and the promotion of quality discussion and criticism.

Check out ProleWiki for a communist wikipedia.

Communism study guide

bottombanner

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS