305
Snap bad (midwest.social)
submitted 1 day ago by lengau@midwest.social to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
75 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Morphit@feddit.uk 3 points 1 day ago

I don't know why you're getting downvoted. It makes perfect sense that Cannonical made it's own proprietary package ecosystem and while technically anyone can build their own snap store, ain't nobody got time for that.

[-] jim3692@discuss.online 1 points 48 minutes ago

I don't agree that it made any sense to do that. If they wanted to containerize apps, there has been an open source solution to that for years; Flatpak.

ain't nobody got time for that

As an app maintainer, that wants to support Ubuntu, why would I prefer to deploy a snap server, instead of publishing deb files, or creating a Flatpak?

[-] DmMacniel@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

Can you explain why it makes perfect sense?

this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
305 points (91.3% liked)

linuxmemes

20707 readers
477 users here now

I use Arch btw

Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
poopsmith@lemmy.world
zephyr@lemmy.world