15
submitted 3 weeks ago by tux0r@feddit.org to c/opensource@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] thejevans@lemmy.ml 17 points 3 weeks ago

That's nice. If your goal is to ever talk to people about open source software, that's going to create a lot of unnecessary confusion.

On top of that, accepting this bolsters companies to use this kind of a definition specifically to take advantage of the mental model that many people have connecting "open source" with OSI.

[-] tux0r@feddit.org -5 points 3 weeks ago

If your goal is to ever talk to people about open source software, that’s going to create a lot of unnecessary confusion.

I guess that my definition of open source is not that uncommon, given that the terms "free software" and "libre software" exist and are rather well-established by this point.

[-] thejevans@lemmy.ml 16 points 3 weeks ago

The fact that there is overlap has no bearing on whether your definition is common.

[-] chebra@mstdn.io 2 points 3 weeks ago

@tux0r You are right that this mistaken definition is quite common. Smart person would try to correct the mistake, not defend it.

this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024
15 points (67.4% liked)

Open Source

30764 readers
494 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS