496
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago

Wait, you think they care if the teenagers get in? We're talking about the elementary school kids.

[-] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Eeh, more complicated than that. Enforcing age restrictions is an obnoxiously complex issue, even though by all reasonable measures it shouldn't be.

The #1 priority of a con is protecting its panelists & volunteers, and while keeping the panelists comfortable is a critical aspect, enforcement of the conditions they need for adult panels can be a logistical nightmare. It's why so many cons are moving away from having any adult oriented panels at all, and it's really sad to see that the most reasonable solution is to just not have them.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Yeah, at the end of the day though you have to set realistic expectations and if you can't round up the staff with that then you can't have it. Trying to card check everyone coming into the room would just take too long.

this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2024
496 points (97.9% liked)

People Twitter

5383 readers
846 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS