317

Sony, Ubisoft scandals prompt California ban on deceptive sales of digital goods (arstechnica.com)

submitted 1 month ago by captainkangaroo@discuss.tchncs.de to c/technology@lemmy.world

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

California recently became the first state to ban deceptive sales of so-called "disappearing media."

On Tuesday, Governor Gavin Newsom signed AB 2426 into law, protecting consumers of digital goods like books, movies, and video games from being duped into purchasing content without realizing access was only granted through a temporary license.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world 40 points 1 month ago

without realizing access was only granted through a temporary license.

That phrasing has me concerend. Does this also cover the services being shut down?

"This is a permanent licence until we go bankrupt and you can't access the content anymore"

Purchase/buy should mean you get a downloadable DRM free file. And thing else is a rental.

[-] tfowinder@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 month ago

Oh no that's Piracy. That's what these guys would say. They want to think you own the media but also you are not free to do what you want with it. Weird kind of ownership.

[-] Landless2029@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

The only games you BUY now are GOG. DRM free.

You can download the installer and archive it. If GOG goes under you can still install and play it.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 7 points 1 month ago

You buy the license to be able to view the media as many times as you wish. If I bought a copy of the Titanic on Google movies, or whatever it's called, I've bought a license to view that movie for however many times I wish for as long as I wish. If Google decides to remove that movie then they need to either pay me back, or give me the right to download the movie.

As long as I don't share that download or make a torrent of it, then it's not piracy.

[-] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 6 points 1 month ago

Weird kind of ownership.

Modern click through agreement: you "buy" a product, but vendor gets to fuck your wife because it says he can right here section 69 🤡

If you don't like it, try your chance in courts, boy!

[-] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

Lul good luck in court. Section 69.420 🤡 says you agree to arbitration, fuck you.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 1 month ago

No they're clever they only agree to arbitration if you're suing them not the other way around. They are very careful to make that explicitly clear

this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024

317 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

59340 readers

1475 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS