140
submitted 4 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net

This was the one soup-throwing which did any damage at all; in this case to the frame.

The penalty is appreciably worse than for minor violent attacks.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 46 points 4 months ago

I said this before when JSO used "washable" paint on Stonehenge: they are punching in the wrong direction. Billionaires don't care about human life, so why would they care about a painting?

These works belong to humanity, and by defacing them, you aren't winning converts—you're just pissing people off. Go vandalize something that belongs to the billionaires making things worse for the rest of us; unless you can win people to your cause, you're going to remain small-time vandals that get outsized prison sentences and unflattering media coverage.

[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 3 points 4 months ago
[-] Telorand@reddthat.com -4 points 4 months ago
[-] vovo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

They don't do it to become popular. They want to throw a wrench in the works to wake people up.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

Ok, what’s “the works” here then? The museum? Civil society? Art?

[-] vovo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 months ago

In this case just everydays course of affairs. Generally, the disruption of the machine.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com -1 points 4 months ago

Who needs to be woken up? Who hasn't heard of climate change or Big Oil? Is defacing a public artifact going to sway Conservatives or Centrists?

Because at 86% of people saying that these acts either don't change their views on climate activism or that they negatively affect them, this seems like it's just "putting people to sleep."

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (33 replies)
this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
140 points (98.6% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5633 readers
563 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS