347
submitted 1 year ago by boem@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] HollandJim@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago

Germany just announced they will discontinue their hydrogen-powered train service in favor of a battery-based solution due to the higher running cost.

Hydrogen may be an alternative, but it has yet to make continuous, solid financial sense for any type of transport.

[-] paintbucketholder@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

If weight isn't an issue, then it makes sense to use a system that only costs a fraction of a hydrogen-powered setup.

Trains don't need to fly. Just pack them full of batteries or - arguably even better - just electrify the line wherever possible.

That's just not an option for planes, so hydrogen remains a potentially viable approach.

[-] a_spooky_specter@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Same goes for large container ships. It won't make sense to use batteries unless there are significant breakthroughs in capacity technology.

[-] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

One of the advantages of hydrogen is that tanks and fuel cells can withstand a large number of "charging cycles" much better than batteries. Additionally, for ships, the amount of energy needed to move is so enormous that I fear we'll have a hard time creating batteries that are feasible for long-distance shipping.

For short distance ferrying (including large, car carrying ferries) on the other hand, Norway has already implemented quite a few electric stretches. The major issue there is building the infrastructure to charge the ferries.

[-] LouNeko@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No they can't, the membranes of fuel cells degrade extremely quickly, as I a couple of 100 cycles before significant efficiency loss. That's currently one of the biggest issues with fuel cells and one of the biggest areas of research. Currently, batteries are far more reliable as an energy source.

[-] ShakyPerception@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I'm just happy that there are efforts being made into alternatives to oil... at any level.

[-] HedonismB0t@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago

Sadly industrial hydrogen production is done by reforming petroleum with steam which releases huge amounts of CO2.

[-] ShakyPerception@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago
[-] sushibowl@feddit.nl 3 points 1 year ago

It's true but the hope is to replace this with green hydrogen production through electrolysis of water. The idea behind this being, in a grid built on a large amount of renewable power there will be times (sunny windy days) with a huge amount of power overproduction. So you could run the electrolysis on all that surplus power and get hydrogen for it, instead of wasting it.

It's hard to say at this point if that idea is going to be successful.

[-] ShakyPerception@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

So in theory, it could become self sustainable. But it’s still very difficult and a long ways off. Thanks for the insight.

this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2023
347 points (93.5% liked)

Technology

59414 readers
1324 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS