249
submitted 1 year ago by ATQ@lemm.ee to c/politics@lemmy.world

U.S. prosecutors on Thursday asked a federal judge to begin former President Donald Trump's trial on charges of trying to overturn the 2020 election on Jan. 2, 2024.

That date would have the trial get underway just two weeks before the first votes are cast in the 2024 Republican presidential primary, a race in which Trump is the front-runner.

U.S. Special Counsel Jack Smith's office said in Thursday's court filing that it believes it will take about four to six weeks to put forward the bulk of their case against Trump at trial.

https://archive.li/2KaM7

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] dhork@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago

He faces a separate criminal trial in Manhattan in March 2024, and another criminal trial from Smith in southern Florida in May 2024.

What happens if the trials overlap?

[-] snowyday@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

They work it out. For example, the Manhattan DA recently stated that he’d be fine with delaying his case so the Fed cases can go ahead

[-] hansl@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 year ago

Man, I feel like this one could pass a Turing test…

[-] A_A@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

There is a bot flare to your username. Are you really a robot replying to someone ?

[-] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Probably checked “bot” in profile settings

[-] Kinglink@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

"Work it out" is a strange way to say it's a dick measuring contest. /s

But yeah, the Feds will almost always win unless they want a different conviction to help make their case.

[-] galaxies_collide@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Sounds like a Trump problem, not an our problem.

[-] Toribor@corndog.social 14 points 1 year ago

It's like Mr. Burns having every disease so that they cancel each other out. He's committed so many crimes the entire Justice system is too backed up to cope.

[-] Nougat@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

We've had one, yes. What about second Justice Department?

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Hehe.

“No we’re not going to let you go to that. Flight risk.”

“Yes we’re absolutely going to file a warrant and keep your bail… don’t worry, we’ll donate it to little kids or something.”

[-] whiskeypickle@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

What happens if the trials overlap?

it’s extra entertaining?

this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2023
249 points (97.7% liked)

politics

19144 readers
1306 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS