-39
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

I was thinking about these numbers actually.

3698 posts in 48 days comes to roughly 77.04 posts per day.

However, I can't remember where I read this, but apparently there are 24 communities/magazines being managed or at least posted to.

It makes sense that the same link would get posted to all 24, and user scripts already exist for lemmy ( https://lemmy.world/post/2638670 ) and kbin ( https://greasyfork.org/en/scripts/by-site/kbin.social ) so it's not hard to imagine a "reposting" user script for lemmy. Would be fairly easy for someone slightly technical to come up with.

Assuming every original post follows with the userscript assisted simultaneous reposting, with the net result of the same post in 24 magazines at once, we should adjust the math as follows:

77.04/24 is approximately 3.21 posts per day.

Of course, this isn't completely accurate. First it's an average, so some days may have double the posts (say 6 per day) while a day or two might even be skipped altogether.

More importantly, it probably doesn't make sense to post every single link into every single magazine every single time, so there's probably a fast & quick config option to adjust the number (i.e. maybe a source isn't considered high enough quality and is left off of /m/politics ). So the true number of posting is likely a bit higher, but even if half are dropped off every time, we're still only up to 7 posts a day (and that's rounding up).

While averaging 7 posts a day can be quite a bit by some measures, it's certainly within the reach of a single, enthusiastic individual.

For every post on the fediverse, one needs to use critical thinking. But also remember the phrase about lies, damn lies, and statistics...

So valid counterpoints to the above would include showing that reposts or duplicate posts in different communities are rare and that almost every post is actually unique, showing that we're not seeing 12 or 24 simultaneous posts but that each post is trickling in roughly every 20 minutes at every hour of a full 24 hour period (i.e. the person never sleeps for weeks on end), and so on.

I haven't dug that deeply into it, but right now I have yet to see enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis (of a single enthusiastic individual with something like userscript assisted reposting).

this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2024
-39 points (13.2% liked)

politics

19145 readers
1667 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS