55
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 2 points 1 week ago
[-] higgsboson@dubvee.org 3 points 1 week ago

It also wouldn't prove anything useful, since students could simply use AI to author it and then just write it out. Then add onto that, writing it with pen would also make it harder to use automated ai-detection.

Something tells me they didnt think this all the way through.

[-] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago

Automated AI-detection doesn't work. That's discussed in the article. Even OpenAI deprecated their detection tool.

[-] higgsboson@dubvee.org 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I mean, detection is and will continue be an arms-race. I've had some success in tests, especially with smaller or older models. Of course openai will not want to pay to develop the detection tools, given the misaligned incentives there. It would be silly to expect them to do so without a government mandate, or something of the sort.

But all that is tangential to my point, since hand-writing would still only change how convenient it is to cheat.

students could simply use AI to author it and then just write it out.

[-] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago

Many companies voluntarily offer solutions to problems they themselves created, to try and prevent government regulation. This isn't a new thing. The MPAA is a perfect example of this that is over 100 years old.

this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2024
55 points (100.0% liked)

Humanities & Cultures

2528 readers
17 users here now

Human society and cultural news, studies, and other things of that nature. From linguistics to philosophy to religion to anthropology, if it's an academic discipline you can most likely put it here.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS