633
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 11 points 1 month ago

So vote for them regardless and then they will listen?

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Dems need all 3 (presidency, house of reps, Senate) to do pretty much anything. They've had that for [drumroll please] 4 out of the last 24 years. Or 6 of the last 32 years. Or 6 of the last 44 fucking years.

[-] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

They've had that for [drumroll please] 4 out of the last 24 years

It was significantly shorter than that when you consider Senate control to be 60, which is what's needed to bypass the fillibuster.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Supermajority was 4 months, out of the last 44 years. But whenever I mention that people think I'm fixated on that for some reason.

*Oh downvoted already. Some people really don't like hearing this.

[-] sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

They honored the fillibuster by choice. They didnt have to.

[-] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

They never had 51 votes to repeal the fillibuster. Sinema and Manchin both refused to do so. Neither of which are Democrats anymore. We should elect more Democrats to the Senate that will.

[-] sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

"Biden says eliminating filibuster would "throw the entire Congress into chaos"" https://www.cbsnews.com/live-updates/joe-biden-town-hall-filibuster/

[-] sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Dems need all 3 (presidency, house of reps, Senate) to do pretty much anything.

Thats not how politics works buddy. If what you said were true neither the dems or republicans would have passed any bills in the history of the "republic". Clearly theres also horse trading, and bribery/lobbying you are pretending dont exist in order to make this weak point.

[-] madjo@feddit.nl 1 points 1 month ago

With the obstructionist MAGA caucus in your government that would rather vote no to bipartisan bills because it would give a Democrat a win, barely any bills get passed!

[-] RustyEarthfire@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

This is an incorrect framing of the situation. You aren't being asked for a Yes/No vote on Democrats. You are being asked if you prefer Democrats or Republicans. Or for this election, if you prefer Democracy or Fascism. If you vote "no preference", that does not communicate "I prefer the Democrats, but want them to move further left", either logically or politically.

There are lots of ways to communicate desired policy changes: letter-writing, primaries (including campaigning/funding for candidates), protests, marches, press, social-media, etc. Voting against your interest is not one of them.

[-] sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You are being asked if you prefer Democrats or Republicans.

I understand why you'd say this. But you arent trying to understand why people are trying to pressure the dem leadership to be better.

[-] RustyEarthfire@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I absolutely understand the anger at the Democratic party. I mention several useful activities to work toward fixing its many failings. The Republican party is strictly worse. Giving equal support to both is counterproductive.

[-] Stovetop@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

The more elections the far right loses, the more the overton window shifts to the left.

[-] leftytighty@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 month ago

Democrats move further right to get votes from the center but when they win it'll go left trust me bro

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They go to the center when they lose. If they don't lose, they don't need to go to the center to find voters. You can see my other comment, they've only had all 3 houses for 4 out of the last 24 years.

[-] sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

you totally ignore that the Dems could simply represent the will of their constituents and not lose, and not need to "look for votes" outside the boundaries of their party. Kamala would be coasting to vicotry if she wasnt supporting Bidens dirty far right war. She is trying hard to not represent the Dems and take a far right stand on this, and thats the root of this problem. Not Progressive voters or the youth.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
[-] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago

This, but unironically.

[-] sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I dont think thats true all the time. as we have seen with Biden, If a dem president is a centrist or far right for a dem, it shifts the entire party and the judiciary rightward. These things have monentum.

So I'd say its not simply the "D" that matters in overton shift. It also sets the topics in the political conversation, and either strengthens the party for the next election or leaves it in shattered and misaligned, like we are now about the unpopular far right wing genocide being pushed by a democratic US presidential administration.

this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2024
633 points (73.7% liked)

Political Memes

5510 readers
1462 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS