67
The Stallman report (stallman-report.org)
submitted 1 month ago by Lionir@beehaw.org to c/foss@beehaw.org
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] galileopie@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

I say socialist because of forced redistribution of any code changes, nobody is allowed to keep any new development for themself to use.

The argument that GPL helps everybody to benefit equally and nobody can keep the code for themself, that's what a socialist says for they government must take everybody's money to help those in need, except now the ones who had the money previously have become needy themselves and the government has all f the money and it's not helping anybody.

It safer for software developers to bad GPL to protect themselves from any troubles and develop on any other operating system where they can choose what code to share and what to keep secret.

Look at how well Sony has done with FreeBSD on Playatation 4 and 5 with the BSD license. The Playstation system stays proprietary but they send code to FreeBSD for any network and server issues. Maybe Sony refused Linux for PS4 due to GPL to protect company secrets.

[-] davehtaylor@beehaw.org 10 points 1 month ago

I say socialist because of forced redistribution of any code changes, nobody is allowed to keep any new development for themself to use.

You have a flawed understanding of socialism

this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2024
67 points (100.0% liked)

Free and Open Source Software

17550 readers
112 users here now

If it's free and open source and it's also software, it can be discussed here. Subcommunity of Technology.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS