500
submitted 1 month ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/news@lemmy.world

Don't try to be Kennedy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 month ago

They do. Texas allows ariel hunting of hogs, there's no season, and no tag limit. I know lots of other areas have similar approaches of differentiating hunting laws and seasons when it comes to invasive species.

All the hunters I've known, have been an outdoor guys and nature conservationists, but also conservative usually.

[-] DemBoSain@midwest.social 10 points 1 month ago

No tag limit? That's too far. I think the limit should be..say...30 to 50 feral hogs.

[-] Gerudo@lemm.ee 16 points 1 month ago

You should come and see how many and how invasive they really are.

[-] Reyali@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

Psst…he was making reference to a meme (see other reply for screenshot).

[-] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I think they still have legal requirements about wanton waste, or at least best effort.

The no tag limit makes sense though, as they're an incredibly invasive species and the aspirational goal is removal.

None of this should be considered legal advice, I could be mistaken on the regulations. You should check them out yourself to make sure I'm not full of shit, or confused.

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago
[-] DemBoSain@midwest.social 3 points 1 month ago

Seems like not everybody got the reference.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago

We need to do a complete extermination of the feral hog population, not only should it be no tag limit there should be a bounty on them.

[-] Floey@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago
[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

The difference is that feral hogs are just that feral. They aint native and are an active harm to the environment, while the incentives may be perverse they would also be decently more effective than what we have right now.

[-] theangryseal@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The point of “perverse incentives” is that the plan doesn’t create a solution at all and isn’t remotely effective because it can can lead to things like some dude catching young females and throwing them in an enclosure with a male, letting them go once they’re pregnant, actively kill off the produced males, and repeat with the females.

If you tell a city to bring in dead rats for a reward, someone is going to start breeding rats in his basement.

Edit:

To make it clear, I’m for no tag limit, but I worry about rewards. Let the sadists go wild with blood. :p Not that I think hunters are sadists, it just takes a different kind of person to massacre on a scale like that.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

Fair enough but such systems have worked in the past, the Aussies put a bounty on emu after the Emu war which worked out quite fine. Maybe mandate that that blood samples and location of kill must be turned in as well that way the department of fish and wild life can do some checking on things. I feel the bounty system could be implemented pretty easily, actually just make it so only hunters with a specific license can get the bounties with regular property check ups.

[-] Kanzar@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Bit harder to breed emus than pigs.

[-] atomicorange@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

I got it, even if nobody else did.

[-] Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 month ago

Texas allows ariel hunting of hogs

And how is a mermaid supposed to do that?

[-] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago

You drop the mermaids onto the hogs from the air; Surf 'n Turf.

[-] robocall@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Most gun owners that I know are not hunters. I'd like to change their perspectives and get them outdoors.

this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2024
500 points (98.6% liked)

News

23287 readers
2030 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS