109
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by starman@programming.dev to c/programming@programming.dev
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] bahmanm@lemmy.ml 48 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is the 2nd of such moves this year to my knowledge; first there was #Lightbend and #Akka and now this. What a year for #FOSS ๐Ÿ˜•

I know for a fact that so many organisations use #hashicorp products for commercial purposes w/o ever contributing back. And I understand how this may feel for hashicorp in these harsh economic times. Though this still is, IMHO, a cheap move: they used an OSS license for a very long time which resulted in a massive user base and a "soft" vendor lock-in, and now they decided to milk that user base.

Looking forwards to solid community-driven forks of their products ๐Ÿ’ช

[-] exu@feditown.com 10 points 1 year ago

From my reading this wouldn't impact organisations just using the product at all. Only probiders that offer services should be impacted. Similar to what Elastic did with their license.

Note I didn't actually read the license text, just browsed the FAQ a bit

this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023
109 points (99.1% liked)

Programming

17314 readers
82 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS