437
submitted 2 years ago by 0x815@feddit.de to c/news@beehaw.org
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Onihikage@beehaw.org 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

You can still do that by adopting kids someone else made. No sense adding to the population when some kids already don't have parents.

[-] aeternum@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago

yup. there are HEAPS of loving kids needing homes. There's no need to add to an overpopulation already when there are so many kids needing homes already.

[-] bloodfart@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

What overpopulation are you talking about?

[-] Black_Gulaman@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 years ago

You make a good point but then again, the numbers game would still be tilted in favor of those who multiply the most.

Why not have 1 child and adopt another, preferably of the same age so that both children won't be lonely and have someone to depend on as family when the parents are gone.

[-] aeternum@kbin.social 13 points 2 years ago

there's nothing that says you can only adopt one kid :)

this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023
437 points (100.0% liked)

World News

23049 readers
2 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS