129
submitted 21 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) by Dot@feddit.org to c/technology@lemmy.world

nuclear power produces long-lived radioactive waste, which needs to be stored securely. Nuclear fuels, such as the element uranium (which needs to be mined), are finite, so the technology is not considered renewable. Renewable sources of energy, such as solar and wind power suffer from “intermittency”, meaning they do not consistently produce energy at all hours of the day.

fusion technologies have yet to produce sustained net energy output (more energy than is put in to run the reactor), let alone produce energy at the scale required to meet the growing demands of AI. Fusion will require many more technological developments before it can fulfil its promise of delivering power to the grid.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

They need heating at winter and they have datacenters and a lot of renewable energy.

Also the principles I've described is applicable for everything non-autonomous, and one could think of "electric" cars (a bit like trams) which would use contacts on the ground for energy, while when they'd need to be autonomous, they'd use batteries or ICEs.

That kind of "mechanical energy storage" can be created everywhere. I mean, water reserves with hydroelectric stations downstream are already used for that purpose, but for those you need water.

Efficiency is a bit of a problem - you have to maintain the mechanical parts, you first use energy to lift something with losses and then generate energy from letting it slide back...

That's all a bit off topic, really.

What's important is that there are ways around lithium for a lot of energy usage of our civilization.

[-] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 minutes ago* (last edited 32 seconds ago)

Yes, they need heating in winter... for a tiny population. And they have very little in the way of data centres.

Again, these are only suitable depending on the environment you're in. E.g. pumped water storage is only effective if you have the terrain to allow for it (a large hill or mountain with space for a large body of water).

I never said lithium was an outright requirement. I said batteries can't currently take the planet off of fossil fuels, then I said that other energy storage systems are very dependent on the location.

E.g. despite there being a lot of rainfall in the UK, there are only 3 places suitable for pumped water energy storage. It can't be relied upon for powering a country.

this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
129 points (88.6% liked)

Technology

58753 readers
4253 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS