1136
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] mojo@lemm.ee 293 points 1 year ago

Jesus, at this point over half the country will ban porn because of religious extremists who hate freedom. Fascism and anti free speech.

[-] Master@lemmy.world 65 points 1 year ago

and then those same people who want it banned close their curtains and start watching it.

[-] mojo@lemm.ee 50 points 1 year ago

Like all these child protecting puritans who end up being pedophiles and sex traffickers lol

[-] Uranium3006@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

They're predators who are paranoid someone's gonna take away "their" prey

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] qwamqwamqwam@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 year ago

Age verification for pornography has something like a 70% approval rating. It’s not a religious extremism issue, it’s a “normies don’t want or care about their freedoms issue”.

[-] psychothumbs@lemmy.world 89 points 1 year ago

I think there's a lot of vague support for keeping porn away from children that evaporates in the context of the actual issue at hand where porn sites are being mandated to collect and store the IDs of every visitor.

[-] phillaholic@lemm.ee 46 points 1 year ago

The concept is not terrible, the implementation is. Passing this law with no secure way of proving identity is where it’s clearly just a Christo-fascist power move.

[-] Sylver@lemmy.world 87 points 1 year ago

I think a law verifying your age over the internet inherently breaks the idea of a free internet, of which we are already seeing degradation of by Google and DRM/web integrity anyways.

[-] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't see how it doesn't violate free speech. Imagine needing the government's permission to talk to someone?

Edit: forgot a word

[-] Sylver@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

I agree. Even internet security protocols are at risk, and the dinosaurs responsible for writing laws don’t understand basic encryption let alone the idea that it is 100% a needed concept in a free, fair, and just society.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 55 points 1 year ago

And fuck sending your driver's license to random shady porn sites

[-] brygphilomena@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

I think there is a lot more to this that a secure way or protecting children.

It's the base idea that I have to prove who I am online at all. That I cannot lie. Lieing should be a fundamental right. Not identifying yourself should be a fundamental right. Giving a false name should be a fundamental right.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

The way the US is going, with anti-LGBT laws popping up all over the place, I have less trust for the government collecting that information than the sketchy porn sites themselves.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Obsession@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The only implementation I would support is one where the asking website doesn't know your ID, and the verifying website doesn't know what you're trying to visit. Essentially just asking for a one-time use token that verified your age, and providing that token to the website you're trying to visit.

Edit for a bit more detail: User authenticates to ID website, which provides them a token with age verification (true/false) and a short (10 minute?) TTL. This token is encrypted by the ID website. User then provides this token to the asking website (eg: pornhub). Pornhub then sends the token back to the ID website to decrypt it. All pornhub knows about you is whether or not you're of age, and the verifying website never knows what the token is for.

[-] NecroSocial@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

There would be too much value in tracking that token for such a scheme to stay secure. Governments or shady corporations or illegal black markets or all of the above would be all over keeping tabs on what sites are visited by which tokens and matching them to identities.

[-] Obsession@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

The whole point is that the token itself doesn't have any personal info attached to it, only a yes/no and expiry time.

I'll even one up my original suggestion - it uses standard public/private key encryption, where the government issues a simple json token with a yes/no Boolean and a TTL. The public key that can decrypt the tokens is public. Pornhub then decrypts the token and verifies the boolean and expiry date, all without talking to the government at all.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[-] mojo@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago

"Are you over 18: Yes/No"

Think nobody is arguing against that. I'd rather not give 1000 different private companies my government ID who get hacked all the time. The same people passing these laws had nude magazines growing up too.

[-] whileloop@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

It's kinda tragic too. I do agree with the sentiment behind age verification, it is in the kids' best interest that they not be using porn at that age. But there's really no way to effectively enforce this without violating basic rights. There is no good solution. Given that dilemma, all we can do is try to better prepare parents to deal with this in their home.

[-] SpaceCadet@sopuli.xyz 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Is it really that bad if kids see a bit of porn? Like really? I grew up before the internet, but even in my day porn mags and VHS tapes got passed around when I was a teenager. Kids are always going to be curious.

Even so on the internet there are much worse things than porn that are harmful for the development of children. There are various groups of questionable morality like incels, or other mysogynistic groups, alt right stuff like neonazis, christofascists, climate deniers, ... If I had children, I would be much more concerned about them falling into one of those ideological traps than them seeing some titties. Hell, even TikTok is probably more harmful for giving them a dopamine addiction and an increasingly short attention span.

So to me, it seems a bit weird to single out porn. It feels like a convenient scapegoat for parents who don't want to spend time raising their kids and paying attention to what they are looking at on the internet.

[-] threadloose@midwest.social 6 points 1 year ago

I don't have kids either, but my siblings and friends do, and kids today aren't just seeing a little porn. It's not like Playboys in the woods or a single 2 MB image downloaded for hours on dial-up. It's pretty violent sexual activities in video, like strangling or surprise anal sex. Even twenty years ago, my first sexual partners had moves they picked up from porn, but they weren't violent. Talking to young women today, the moves their partners are picking up and have been normalized by porn tend to be violent. Like, I never had a friend in college tell me that her boyfriend slapped her during sex and called her a dirty whore while she cried, but that seems to be a pretty common experience today.

The issue is that even older teens don't have the life experience to contextualize what they see in porn and separate it from how you act in real life. If you're into slapping people, that's fine, but you've got to talk to your partner about it before you do to. If you're getting your sex education from porn, then you don't get the people skills part that's important for successful relationships in real life.

This study touches on a lot of what I'm mentioning here, and they found a correlation between violence in teen relationships and porn viewing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6751001/

So, yeah. I don't know what the solution is. I don't think it's sending a copy of your ID to a porn site, which seems incredibly risky for other reasons. I think sex and relationship education would help a lot, but that only connects with the kids who listen. Obviously there's a parenting component there, but I don't know how many parents are mentally health enough to have those conversations honestly. 🙃 Probably not the ones who wrote this bill.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Brainsploosh@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

How is it in their best interest not to consume porn?

I would have guessed that's where the religious oppression was targeted, whatwith being overly obsessed about peoples' sexualities.

[-] Uranium3006@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

Indeed, it's often stated but seldom justified. Religion is far more dangerous than boobs on a screen, we need to protect kids from sexual abuse in church instead

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

At what age? 6? Sure.

16? 13? Less likely that it's "in their best interest", because they're now dealing with those physical and psychological changes that are very much in line with the content of porn.

Just like TV, movies, video games, books, and other forms of fantasy / entertainment, parents need to be involved, have earnest communication with, and provide education for, their kids about the porn they will be consuming.

But "porn is icky", so they won't.

[-] mojo@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago

The simple "Are you over 18? Yes/No" prompt worked just fine. If a kid lies and presses yes, who fucking cares lol. They're not seeing it on accident at that point. We need to stop this puritan society, kids are going to explore this stuff. They always have and they always will.

[-] umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago

70% approval rating but what's the base? If it only surveyed 10 people and 7 say yes, it is 70% but means nothing.

load more comments (1 replies)

Genuinely curious where you're getting these numbers. I can't seem to find any formal public opinion polls on the enacted or proposed bills

[-] qwamqwamqwam@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There was a Politico article about this last week:

https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2023/08/08/age-law-online-porn-00110148

The public is also on her side. “You poll this, it’s like an 85-15 issue,” explained Jon Schweppe, the policy director for the socially conservative think tank American Principles Project. Age-verification for porn is not his think tank’s only priority, but when they poll it against other priorities in swing states, age-verification blows the rest out of the water, with 77 percent in support and 15 percent opposed.

Here’s a Pew survey suggesting that the majority of Americans consider porn harmful:

A large 70%-majority of Americans reject the idea that “nude pictures and X-rated videos on the internet provide harmless entertainment for those who enjoy it”; only 27% agree; in general, opinions about pornography have become slightly more conservative over the past 20 years. Currently 41% agree that “nude magazines and X-rated movies provide harmless entertainment for those who enjoy it,” while 53% disagree. The number saying such material is harmless has fluctuated, declining from 48% in 1987 to 41% in 1990 and then varying by no more than four percentage points thereafter. The pattern is more mixed for other values related to freedom of expression.

Note that trends in this space are getting more conservative, rather than less. This tracks with my experience with Gen Z.

Admittedly, I have not seen any polling about specific legislation. It hasn’t been long since these bills were passed, and I don’t know if it’s a priority for pollsters. But if nothing else, just look through the thread. Lemmy leans way further left that the general public, and even here most people’s problems with it are about execution rather than intent.

[-] NecroSocial@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

A lot of Gen-Z, of Gen-Y and Millennials are re-adopting 1950's prudishness. That has the potential to really be horrible for a generation or two before the repression sparks another sexual revolution.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 4 points 1 year ago

I have a source: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1365965/us-adults-support-online-age-verification-by-gender/

68% of people either Strongly or Somewhat support verification mechanisms for online content.

[-] Wahots@pawb.social 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The only porn left will be yiff, because sites struggle to classify it as porn (it even makes it past google's filters). And a new generation of furries will be born. Their ban will be their undoing, lmao.

"The elder scrolls told of their return. The defeat was merely a delay."

[-] mojo@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

The less furry porn lore I know the better

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] theneverfox@pawb.social 11 points 1 year ago

Oh, don't forget kosa, it has bipartisan support

They want to hold sites responsible for children accessing NSFW content on them. Which means ID of some kind

It would also apply to user posted content

[-] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 9 points 1 year ago

I doubt it could be actually banned. The US had this fight decades ago and Porn was given 1A protections. If they could ban it they would but they can't so they are doing the next best thing by making it inconvenient and uncomfortable for people to get to.

[-] mojo@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

The problem though is that all those things we fought for before and being rolled back. You could have said the same about abortion, but then we regressed because of religious extremists.

[-] xc2215x@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Christian conservatives want it banned for sure.

load more comments (17 replies)
this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023
1136 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

59648 readers
1605 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS